I mentioned no names, you came out with that yourself.

Now the research I have read comes to the conclusion that there is no
such thing as race, however the effects are that the view of race and
the concept of hatred in racism is that we have a social concept
called race that was founded when there were no scientific methods
available to prove of the existance of separate races, yet now we have
those tools people want to look to science to prove an old concept of
seperation that has led to the prejudice of racism existing in our
current time hundreds of years later.

Just using the term race does not mean it exists.

anyway as I said this group is not about arguing about race or the
concept and is diverting attension away from the real problem of group
stalking and harassment, where people make it their lifes goal to
bring missery and pain into peoples lives for their entertainment and
peverse enjoyment and to try to boost their egos, that is the problem,
they are cowards and wont ever try a fair confrontation, so they hide
behind stalking campaigns, pretending they are greater than the sum of
their parts.

--- In AntiRacismUK@..., "w.raynolds" <w.raynolds@...>
wrote:
>
> > it seems all the posters apart
> > from Sally seem to be posting or agreeing with subjects that would
> > seem to be conceived from a racists viewpoint.
>
> Are you serious? Which of my postings are conceived from a racist
> viewpoint?
>
> As to whether 'race' exists, I'm not an anthropologist, but did you
> check with the Royal Anthropological Institute website? I just have,
> and they use the term. So perhaps you banned a legitimate
> anthropologist who was just trying to be helpful.
>
> I don't wish to fall out with you. I agree with your aims entirely,
> but I think you're being a bit unfair. The fact is that this group
> is specifically to fight racial harassment, but the title is just
> Anti Racism UK. So anyone interested in fighting racism, or in
> Fatima's case feels a victim is likely to subscribe.
>
> Do you think it might be best to change the name to something more
> specific?
>
> I should add that sexual harassment can be even worse than racial
> harassment.
>
> Regards
>
> Bill
>
>
>
>
> --- In AntiRacismUK@..., "deji_one" <deji_one@>
> wrote:
> >
> > Sorry but politics, religion and ethnicity are not the focus of this
> > group, discussing the problems of racist harassment and group
> stalking
> > whether this is in the workplace or community is the primary focus
> of
> > this group, while I can appreciate your concerns I have doubts about
> > the intensions, as I have seen it before, the number of members are
> > not the issue, helping people is and being down apparently to two
> > members was not due to people leaving.
> >
> > What I do find suspicious is when I post a topics about the subject
> of
> > stalking and get reply's that have nothing to do with the subject
> > matter, instead the beginnings of an argument about whether or not
> > race exists, which it does not within the human race according to
> the
> > human genome project, so instead a person claiming to be an
> > anthropologist then posts only about this, must be coincidence.
> >
> > Of Fatima, I did not reply to her, I did not have time, so did not
> get
> > the opportunity, however I agree with Sally's points and do not find
> > them racist, she as well as myself have concerns to the legitimacy
> of
> > Fataima's claims, as far as it goes it seems all the posters apart
> > from Sally seem to be posting or agreeing with subjects that would
> > seem to be conceived from a racists viewpoint.
> >
> > For paranoia, no, just being aware of peoples real intensions, like
> > Sally is able to spot.
> >
> >
> > --- In AntiRacismUK@..., "w.raynolds" <w.raynolds@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I agree there is a risk of some infiltration. But not that
> much. You
> > > do seem to have an unfortunate ability to lose members.
> > >
> > > Since you started - not very long ago - you gained 6. That's
> good.
> > > But one way and another you're now down to 2.
> > >
> > > From your response I gather you've banned some of them. But
> reading
> > > through the messages I wouldn't say that any of them are right-
> wing
> > > extremists. On the contrary some are pro Jewish.
> > >
> > > The way Fatima was treated was disgraceful. Anyone could see it
> was a
> > > misunderstanding due to a cultural gap. Any social worker will
> tell you
> > > that not allowing for another person's cultural difference is
> itself a
> > > form of racism.
> > >
> > > Bill
> > >
> >
>