Mental Health Bill 'to be axed'
Controversial new laws to detain people with untreatable personality disorders,
even if
they have not committed a crime, are set to be abandoned.
Ministers will concede they cannot get the Mental Health Bill Parliament, and so
will try to
amend existing laws.

Mental health charity Mind backed the predicted scrapping of the bill.

But Mind said it could oppose new plans on how long people with personality
disorders
would be locked up without appeal if it considered them excessive.

The Mental Health Bill had proposed allowing people to be held for 28 days
before facing a
tribunal.


The assumption that people with mental health problems are dangerous to society
is
absolutely false
Sophie Corlett
Policy director, Mind
Mind policy director Sophie Corlett said she was very concerned with what might
replace
the Bill.

"If they simply take all the bits of the draft (bill) that they have been
working on all this
time and stick them on to the previous Act ,we will simply end up with a piece
of
legislation that doesn't fit together but will have all the problems with the
previous
legislation."

She said the government was now considering plans for up to 42 days' detention
for some
mentally ill patients without referral to a tribunal.

"Even suspected terrorists only get 28 days in this country," Ms Corlett told
BBC Radio 4's
Today programme.

"Forty-two days for somebody who is ill, who somebody suspects might be a danger
- this
is all based on the assumption that people with mental health problems are
dangerous to
society.

"And on a second assumption that you can predict who those people are going to
be -
both of which assumptions are absolutely false."

BBC home affairs editor Mark Easton said proposals beyond the bill's 28 days
would be
likely to face a challenge under human rights legislation.

'Unholy mess'

Mr Easton said the Mental Health Bill was "always a bill with huge problems - it
was trying
to do two quite contradictory things".

Michael Stone's 1998 conviction for the brutal murders of Lin and Megan Russell
first
prompted the government to propose new laws.

Stone was regarded as a dangerous psychopath but, because his condition was
untreatable, he could not be held under mental health powers.

Ministers wanted to widen the scope for locking up people with personality
disorders,
while also needing new rules to comply with the Human Rights Act 1998.

"When they tried to merge these two ideas, they ended up in an unholy mess," Mr
Easton
said.

He said the bill foundered because the proposal to allow everyone held to appeal
to a
tribunal within 28 days, alongside a likely increase in the number of people
detained,
suggested a vast bureaucracy would be needed to process appeals.

Objections from some politicians and mental health campaigners were raised and
ministers decided not to back the legislation.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/health/4835484.stm

Published: 2006/03/23 10:09:10 GMT

© BBC MMVI