Sign In
New User? Sign Up
BromleyNWA · BROMLEY Neighbourhood Watch Association
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
You can set the sort order of messages? Just click on the link in the date column. Your preferences will be remembered, so you don't have to do it again when you return.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
News: 'Betrayal' over home defence law   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #209 of 373 |
decision not to pass a law giving homeowners greater power to defend their properties from intruders has been described as a "betrayal" by a local MP.
Shailesh Vara, who represents North West Cambridgeshire, criticised the Government for doing a U-turn on its promised changes to self defence laws.
 
He had hoped Justice Secretary Jack Straw’s pledge to amend the law to favour the victim of an attack or burglary in a home would see the law changed.
 
That would have mirrored proposals contained in Mr Vara’s Private Members’ Bill of last year.
 
But the amendment to the Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill now tabled by the Government, seeks only to clarify what constitutes “reasonable force”.
 
Whether or not “reasonable force” has been used is the current test to determine if someone has gone too far when tackling a burglar in their home.
 
Mr Vara said: “This is a betrayal of the former promise by Jack Straw. I will continue to champion the rights of the house holder.
 
“I very much hope it will not be long before the Government sees sense and gives greater protection to the householder when they are confronted by an intruder.
 
“I was originally hopeful that the Government was serious about changing the law in this area.
 
“Unfortunately, it now looks like Jack Straw’s Conference speech was a merely a populist gesture made in expectation of an early election.
 
“In contrast, my Private Members’ Bill of last year, and the Conservative Party’s amendment to the Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill would change the balance of the law in favour of those being attacked, or having their property broken into.
 
“We would do this by simply changing the test of what is lawful so that only those who used ‘’grossly disproportionate force’’ in trying to defend themselves, others or their property would be at risk of prosecution.”
 
The debate about householders’ rights to use force to defend their property, and to what degree, was opened up when Norfolk farmer Tony Martin shot dead teenager Fred Barras during a burglary at his home in Emneth Hungate, near Wisbech, in 2001.
 
He was sentenced to five years in jail for manslaughter, and Brendan Fearon,one of the burglars who was injured in the incident, tried unsuccessfully to sue him for £15,000.
 
Other MPs have since attempted, on numerous occasions, to change the law.
 
 
The full article contains 406 words and appears in Peterborough ET newspaper.
Last Updated: 10 January 2008 4:23 PM
Published Date: 11 January 2008
Source: Peterborough ET
Location: Peterborough


Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:02 am

omnivisual2
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #209 of 373 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

A decision not to pass a law giving homeowners greater power to defend their properties from intruders has been described as a "betrayal" by a local MP. ...
dave@...
omnivisual2
Offline Send Email
Jan 13, 2008
1:02 am

Not only is this splitting hairs and becoming a political football, it effectively represents an absurd attempt by Conservatives to pretend to introduce...
Rikd Cmei5
londheart
Offline Send Email
Jan 13, 2008
10:34 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! UK. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help