Sign In
New User? Sign Up
CanalScapeBCN · CanalScape-BCN
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
You can add links to your Web sites related to your group?

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
BCN Tugs Question   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #235 of 613 |
Re: BCN Tugs Question

The BCN tugs as built today are true to myth rather than reality!
Virtually none had boatmans cabins, many had low cabins for access
through low side bridges, Dudley tunnel etc. In essence most were
utilarity items, built strong and rudimentary or converted from
previous craft.
The Wyrley and Essington, 473ft level traffic was dominated by coal.
Oversize "Hampton" boats were built to increase the tonnage hauled.
Typically a tug, around 45-50ft, ie "Enterprise" from the Thomas
fleet or "Judith Anne" from Keays would haul between 4-6 boats in a
train. The fore ends of these boats would be heavily ballasted which
together with a powerful engine and large propeller would provide the
momentum at the counter to steer tha hauled boat. Bear in mind
a "Hampton" could have 40tons on board, the ballasted fore end kept
the tug "aimed". Elements used some ex GU motors and actually loaded
the motor, their trains were usually two to three boats. Its amazing
to think that back in the early 1950's the W&E was the canal reported
as carrying the highest tonnage in the country, working of course 24
hours a day!
The last I saw of "Joan 2" was when it was docked at Keays in the
late 70's after that it was moored in Birmingham at Fazeley st.







Sat Feb 2, 2008 8:02 pm

lhpvideo
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #235 of 613 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Modern so-called replica BCN tugs are generally built somewhere between 55 and 60ft long. Handy for navigatiing the whole canal system especially the northern...
paulchunter
Offline Send Email
Feb 2, 2008
7:50 pm

The BCN tugs as built today are true to myth rather than reality! Virtually none had boatmans cabins, many had low cabins for access through low side bridges,...
Laurence
lhpvideo
Offline Send Email
Feb 2, 2008
8:02 pm

Reposted as apparantly it didn't work properly last time: What I was particularly intrigued by is whether the length of the tug was determined by the working...
paulchunter
Offline Send Email
Feb 9, 2008
1:26 pm

The answer to the style which Thomas's chose may seem a little odd. Thomas were very powerful in the canal transport hierarchy, sparring almost continously...
Laurence
lhpvideo
Offline Send Email
Feb 9, 2008
1:51 pm

Hi Lawrence and Paul, with my family having worked for all the companies mentioned here at some point I feel I can comment on this. My family always called the...
exiledbaggie
Offline Send Email
Feb 9, 2008
4:17 pm

On the subject of Tugs, T & S Element installed a large water tank holding 700 gallons in the fore end of one of their tugs.Coupled to the engine they thought...
Max Sinclair
robert354643
Offline Send Email
Feb 10, 2008
4:18 pm

Firstly apologies for starting a topic which appears to be "off topic" for a group cocerned with canal structures. In fairness my original query was whether...
paulchunter
Offline Send Email
Feb 11, 2008
9:24 am

Dear All The wartime Harris tugs were also designed to act as icebreakers so presumably that influenced the length of the hull. Martin O'Keeffe...
hecla777
Offline Send Email
Feb 11, 2008
7:26 pm

A couple of points Laurence. 1. The miniature concrete Joeys at Calf Heath. I rather think the late Colonel Ritchie may have acquired some of these, it was...
David Blagrove
evorgalb1
Offline Send Email
Feb 9, 2008
4:13 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! UK. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help