Sorry Russell - I agree with Julian's logic, based on the fact your rules have ORs as well as NOTs.

So by your rules below, for example, anyone who has NOT done a 500k will be a novice due to the OR, irrespective of the number of regionals they've done!!

Rolf

Hi Julian

They have to be OR's otherwise, as an example, a pilot who never enters Regional's will always remain a Novice even if he/she flies a 1000km as putting AND's in will require all requirements to be met before a pilot is required to move on a class.

I am sure it was the intention that a pilot moves on to another class if any one of the requirements are exceeded?

Russell

---

From: East_Mids_ICL@yahoogroups.co.uk [mailto:East_Mids_ICL@yahoogroups.co.uk] On Behalf Of Julian Bane
Sent: 08 May 2009 11:29
To: East_Mids_ICL@yahoogroups.co.uk
Subject: [East_Mids_ICL] Re: New Rules - Bringing All the Threads Together

Hi Russell,

I think the ORs should be ANDs in the clauses. As for the rest, it works for me.

Julian

--- In East_Mids_ICL@yahoogroups.co.uk, "Russell Cheetham" <russellcheetham@...> wrote:
>
> Wouldn't this be better in reverse to illustrate that pilots of lower
> experience may always move up a class as required or wished.
> This is how the original National Interclub wording was couched.
>
> Suggested below to incorporate all additional caveats that appear to be
> suggested and required:-
> --------------------
> Novice - a pilot who has not flown a UK 300km in UK as P1 in any year
> except the current and previous one OR has not entered more than 1
> Regional's OR has not flown a UK 500km as P1
>
> Intermediate - a pilot who has not flown a 750km in UK as P1 OR has not
> achieved a top 50% position in any Nationals last ten years
>
> Pundit - anyone can be a pundit
> -------------------
>
> I would like to see Junior Championship(Regional's) excluded from Novice
> definition as Juniors aspire to enter this free(BGA funded) event even
> before they have a Silver C
>
> Is the above any good??????
>
> Russell
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: East_Mids_ICL@yahoogroups.co.uk
> [mailto:East_Mids_ICL@yahoogroups.co.uk] On Behalf Of Chris Davison
> Sent: 07 May 2009 17:24
> To: East_Mids_ICL@yahoogroups.co.uk
> Subject: Re: [East_Mids_ICL] New Rules - Bringing All the Threads
> Together
>
>
>
>
>
>
> So,
>
> if you have done a 750 or finished in the top half of a national you
> are a pundit
>
> if you have done a 300 or competed in 2 regionals you are an
> intermediate
>
> and if you have done neither you are a novice
>
> ????
>
> Chris
>
>
> Chris Davison
> DNS-Arrow Client Executive
>
> +44(0) 115 9454249 / 634249
> +44(0) 7802 948474 / 37-273983
> Chris_Davison@...
>
> Assistant: Karen Main
> +44 (0) 1926 464304 / 664304
> 8BIMAIK@...
>
>
>
> "chris.luton" <chris.luton@...>
> Sent by: East_Mids_ICL@yahoogroups.co.uk
>
> 07/05/2009 17:09
> Please respond to
> East_Mids_ICL@yahoogroups.co.uk
>
>
> To
> East_Mids_ICL@yahoogroups.co.uk
> cc
> Subject
> [East_Mids_ICL] New Rules - Bringing All the Threads Together
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear All
>
> Thanks for spotting my deliberate mistake Chris - just checking everyone
> was reading the new rules carefully!
>
> During the conversation at HUS it was definitely a case of "OR" and the
> rule in relation to the move for a pilot from Novice to Intermediate was
> having competed in 2 or more Regionals. This was to stop someone who had
> only done one or two days of their first Regional and perhaps realised
> it was a bit beyond them, not to suddenly be classified as an
> Intermediate. I think with the 2 Regionals or more rule, we have no need
> for the extra year?
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
>
>
>
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
> 3AU
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 4061 (20090507) __________
>
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
>
> http://www.eset.com
>

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.325 / Virus Database: 270.12.21/2104 - Release Date: 05/08/09 06:34:00