Hi Nigel

Sadly my rules are full of typos because it gets to th epoint where I cant see
the woods for the trees.

Thanks for taking the time to point out the typos and I will use what what you
have provided to see what corrctions need to be made.

Glad you like the rules and if you have any questions please feel free to post
them on this site and hopefully either onther members or myself will be able to
assit.

All the best and a happy new year.

Dave

--- In PKG@..., "magwr2002" <nigel.ashcroft@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> What an excellent set of rules, I just stumbled upon them whilst searching for
stuff on the ECW.
>
> I have bought many sets of ECW rules over the years and none have hit the
right spot, I would always find that they didn't quite fit the period and would
have to tinker with them. However, on reading your rules I found that they were
very very good and no hint of a need to tinker to improve them.
>
> I have noticed a couple of typos in the rules that you might not be aware of
and a couple of points to clarify:
>
> 1] References to appendix F:
> A] Pg 9 Rule 9 example 3rd line
> B] Pg 9 Rule 10 1st para 2nd line
> C] Pg 21 Rule 27 example 2nd line
> I assume this is appendix E?
>
> 2] Page 36 Rule 61 Bullet point 3:
>
> note `in the ...unit' should this actually say? `In the table `0'...unit may
be used as the artillery factor
>
> 3] pg 40 Rule 69 bullet point 5:
>
> `melee' shouldn't this be musket? At line 1 & 2
>
> 4] Page 40 How to use the firing system:
>
> Paragraph3 `The Parliaments..'
> Line 5 [total 6MP] should be 5MP?
> Line 6 Musket factor [10] should be 9MP?
>
> Regards
>
> Nigel
>
>
> --- In PKG@..., "d.marks@" <d.marks@> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All
> >
> > Well a lot of people have downloaded the latest edition of the rules.....any
comments, good or bad I would like to hear from you.
> >
> > All the best
> >
> > Dave
> >
>