CAN USCF MEMBERS BE SERIOUS ENOUGH?

(TO SAVE THEIR OWN LIVES?, or can Americans ever be good for chess?)

 

After a long history of a low level of discussion and criticism in the USCF promulgated among its membership by the leadership the non-serious nature of criticism can be guaranteed as in fact the majority of USCF members can be said to act juvenile.

 

For the most part the USCF is not a serious organization as officially it has never seriously exercised nor attempted to exercise influence as a sport, though in many countries chess federations do exercise at times considerable influence and a close relationships with the government.

 

If “Steve in Bama” wishes to make unqualified statement as he has been in this forum that:

 

“It is well known that Larry Parr and Lonnie Kwalter are undercover CIA agents assigned to the dangerous world of the USCF and the chess world at large. They are also Martian double agents bent on universal domination of all games of logic.”

I suppose he can but again he sounds like a cutout (Intelligence term for an expendable agent) is a faceless nameless nobody (who frankly sounds like a straight face liar with a dogmatic fanatical slant to the extreme right [PLEASE TAKE NOTICE OF HIS TAG LINE AT THE END OF HIS POST expressing extreme rightist tendencies), who I add may also be sowing confusion to distract attention away from Larry Parr, and Lonnie Kwalter, as well as toward them.

 

If "Steve in Bama" actually ever learned how to read and write well (he seems to have potential) he would of learned that:

“Over 100 foundations were named as CIA conduits in 1967.[24]”

 (NOTE  24. Facts on File, 1967, pp. 79-80. This lists all the foundations, mainly by summarizing reports from the New York Times, the Washington Post, and Congressional Quarterly from February 14-25, 1967, excerpted from Philanthropists at War, Daniel Brandt, http://www.namebase.org/news15.html

Now perhaps he is not qualified to speak on these issues, but I am (if I wish to) as my direct contacts with intelligence agents (1968-2003) has qualified me to do so.

Did I like “Steve in Bama” ever name those two individuals as CIA agents even in jest?

no I didn't !, but:

1)       You can rest assured that if I had they would be, as even in the USCF there are many suspects of which I do not jest which for the good of chess should be depoliticized.

2)       “Steve in Bama” actually proves my point where even dumb ass average Americans like him with clean patriotic appearances can under estimate the seriousness of these matters which (a) if he were a prisoner might at best get him and his associates interrogated at best by so called friendly intelligence forces, e.g.’ Jonathan Pollard); or, (b) killed like as if he were a hostage in an aeroplane just like the Munich Olympics.

A1