SAM TIS SOUNDS QUITE TRUE WHAT YOU STATE Mr Bauer seems preferentially treated because he is on the EB as he also seems lacking the principles that would require others MORE HONEST to immediately step down which we encourage him to do. IN FACT ALL BOARD MEMBERS, THE CANDIDIATES SHOULD NOT GO ANY FURTHER UNTIL THE MATTER IS CORRECTED AS ALSO YOU SHOULD SUPPLY AN ACCURATE PHOTO INSTEAD OF ONE 30 years old.
IN CONCORDANCE WITH YOUR FEARS I AGREE THERE IS A RABID CONSPIRACY OF ALL OF US AGAINST YOU AND YOU CAN PLEASE QUOTE ME AS SAYING THAT:
"SOME OF THE PEOPLE CAN BE AGAINST YOU SOME OF THE TIME, SOME OTHER PEOPLE CAN BE AGAINST YOU THE REST OF THE TIME, BUT NOT EVERYONE OR ANYBODY CAN BE AGAINST ANYONE ALL OF THE TIME NOT EVEN IF THEY ARE COMPLETE BASTARDS, AND YOUR NAME IS SAM SLOAN OR ANDREW ZITO"
IF YOU REPENT AND WILL TRY TO MEND YOUR WAYS AND STOP BEING A LONER BY WORKING IN GROUPS SOME WILL WORK WITH AND YOU. OR ARE YOU SCARED? DO YOU NEED A BUSINESS EMAIL ACCOUNT YOUR EMAIL BOXES SEEM TO OVERFLOW???
~A~
Andrew Stergiou
USCF member
PO Box 1615
Altoona Pa 16603
sloan@... wrote:
On 11 Apr 2005 06:09:44 -0700, Randy Bauer <Randy_member@...>
wrote:
>In article <0ot6e.11239$Xm3.7998@trndny01>, Chess One says...
>>
>>
>>"Randy Bauer" <randybauer2300@...> wrote in message
>>news:yNl6e.4838$GJ.128@attbi_s71...
>>
>><snips>
>>
>>> USCF's own documents tell the candidates to send the information to the
>>> office, which is what Randy Bauer does. The Secretary tells Randy Bauer
>>> not to worry about it. Sloan and Parr then both lie about what Bauer's
>>> motion actually does.
>>>
>>> And so it goes.
>>>
>>> Randy Bauer
>>
>>I don't think we should be hearing from Randy Bauer's declarations on this
>>issue of which rules are in force, I think we should be hearing from Mike
>>Nolan who is the appointed invigilator for the election process.
>>
>>It seems that Mr. Bauer clearly admits that he did not act within the
>>byelaws, and both discounts his own error by citing the Secretary, who said
>>"don't worry about it", but in Sam Sloan's late submission case, when Glenn
>>P said "don't worry about it" we have a special board motion to censor the
>>issue. The same Secretary voting against Mr. Bauer's motion, presumably for
>>the same reason that he excepted Mr. Bauer's own lapse.
>
>I didn't "clearly admit" any such thing. I didn't rely on Don Schultz saying
>"don't worry about it" -- I made the payment BY THE DEADLINE by credit card.
>I'm looking at my credit card statement as I type this. It shows:
>
>Sale date: January 10, 2005; Post date: January 10, 2005; Reference number:
>CGJDQ66S; US CHESS FEDERATION NEW WINDSOR NY, $250.00
>
>There was no "lapse" on my part -- my documents and payment were received
>according to the election regulations published by the USCF, which read:
>
>"There are four seats on the USCF Executive Board up for election in 2005. These
>are four-year terms that will begin at the conclusion of the Delegates Meeting
>in August of 2005.
>Any USCF member can be nominated for election to the Executive Board of the
>USCF. Each nomination must be accompanied by a petition containing the
>signatures of 30 or more Voting Members of the U.S. Chess Federation, and by a
>filing fee of $250 payable to the U.S. Chess Federation. Both the petition and
>the filing fee must be received by either the USCF Secretary or the USCF office
>by January 10, 2005."
>
>End of story, at least the non-fictional account. I'm sure Phil, Sam, and Larry
>will now write the fictional version.
>
>Randy Bauer
Except that the by-laws say something different, and you are entrusted
with following the by-laws of the organization of which you are a
board member.
If you were not a board member, your candidacy would have been
declared invalid immediately. It is only because you are on the board
and have the power to hire and fire USCF staff that you are still
considered a candidate. On the other hand, if I were on the board, my
statement would have been published in Chess Life instead of a blank
space appearing there.
Sam Sloan
Offline 
Send Email