Sign In
New User? Sign Up
USCFRNF · U.S.C.F. Rank and File Committee
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
You can search the group for older messages.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Re: If you are speaking of the Nov 16th-17th 2005 Exec Bd meeting   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #59 of 100 |
Mr. Channing:
 
Regarding your posting/s, upon study given sufficient time, the problems raised in what is made even more difficult by the regular posting of undated unclear documents on the websites of the USChess.org related to the issues, it has concluded that those matters referenced by you and I, must be further addressed publicly in that:
 
1. You say those issues were for discussion by the executive board in a November 2005 meeting, it is furthermore noticed that on the Nov 16th-17th 2005 Exec Bd meeting agenda, there is no indication that those matters will be actually scheduled to be discussed in any manner shape or form.
 
2. That the meeting listed was to be held in closed session, and if correct will not be clearly in the interests of the membership, preventing their study, and input, which will engender distrust and suspicion generally rather than good will.
 
3. In that you and the other executive Board members have not as of yet endeavored to address publicly those matters in some agressive appropiate and specific particular fashion, the membership has no reason to believe the issues will actually be appropiately addressed culminating in some affirmative result.
 
4. The only agenda reference found regarding an "Update on Chess Life changes, to incorporate changed emphasis as a result of cancellation of School Mates." which does not sufficiently address the issues as a matter of fact, information, and belief, to be indentifibly.
 
5. You have not further commented and as such presumed to be a party to the aforementioned acts.
in concerns raised, as specificly the board members have been publicly silent in what tends to lend weight and credibility to the thought/s and possibility that their position is that something wrong did not actually occur. That members were not cheated, and that the board will attempt to side track in some manner as the issues were something created by past administrations,  responsibly for which as a matter of principle is objected to in advance as unreassuing in sufficient and irresponsible.
 
Andrew Zito
P.O.Box 1615
Altoona, Pa 16603


http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/USCFRNF
http://groups.yahoo.co.jp/group/temple_of_reason
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/USCF-RNF
http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/FIDE-Chess-International
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/temple_of_reason
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chess_travel
http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/AZSULA


Yahoo! Messenger NEW - crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail

Sun Oct 23, 2005 10:05 am

the_pushed_pawn
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #59 of 100 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Mr. Channing: Regarding your posting/s, upon study given sufficient time, the problems raised in what is made even more difficult by the regular posting of...
The Organization
the_pushed_pawn
Offline Send Email
Oct 23, 2005
10:44 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! UK. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help