MR Eric Johnson: I know you are an idiot but Where as in 2000-2001 when 50,000 plus some scholastic members of USCF their membership subscriptions cut unilaterally by the USCF from 12 to 4 copies. You and the loud mouth scum buckets you represent did nothing except harass honest ADULT DUES PAYING USCF members such as myself (in fact you continue to harass monest USCF members) every time we wish to do the minimal.
So Please crawl back into what ever hole you just crawled out of as the mean obnoxious spiteful rat bastard you are for you and your friends should not be considered any better than any other form of child molesting and obnoxious bastards as you sound as logical as Bobby Fischer.
These matters have been reported law enforcement authorites so go steal pawns somewhere else you are as unworthy as they come.
chesspride@... wrote:
chesspride@... wrote:
In a message dated 10/23/05 5:13:01 AM Eastern Daylight Time, the_pushed_pawn@... writes:
Mr. Channing:
Regarding your posting, upon study given sufficient time to study the
problems raised in what is made even more difficult by the regular
posting of undated unclear documents on the websites of the
USChess.org related to the issues it has concluded that those matters
made reference to by you and I, must be fruther addressed publicly in
that:
1. You say those issues were for discussion by the executive board in
a November meeting, it is furthermore noticed that on the Nov 16th-
17th 2005 Exec Bd meeting agenda, there is no indication that those
matters will be actually scheduled to be discussed in any manner
shape or form.
2. That meeting listed was to be held in closed session, and if
correct will not be in the interests of the membership, but be
preventing study, and will engender distrust and suspicion rather
than good will.
3. In that the other executive Board members have not endeavored to
address publicly those matters in some agressive appropiate and
specific particular fashionm the membership has no reason to believe
the issues will actually be appropiately addressed culminating in
some affirmative result.
4. The only agenda reference found regarding an "Update on Chess Life
changes, to incorporate changed emphasis as a result of cancellation
of School Mates." does not sufficiently address the issues as a
matter of fact, information, and belief, to be indentifibly addressed.
5. You have not further commented and as such presumed to be a party
to the aforementioned acts.
Concerns raised as specificly the board members have been publicly
silent tend to lend weight and credibility to the thought/s and
possibility that their position is that something wrong did not
actually occur: That members were not cheated, and that board will
attempt to side track the issue as something past administrations are
responsible for which as a matter of principle is objected to in
advance as unreassuing in sufficient and irresponsible.
Andrew Zito
http://pushedpawn.org
Mr. Channing and the USCF board shouldn't even be responding to your ludicrous claims.
Members buy a membership -- the contents of the membership are flexible and open to change at any time by a vote of the delegates.
The two publications (CL and SM) are a benefit of membership -- they are published solely for the purpose of communicating to the USCF's membership.
You would have a claim if 50,000 people bought a *subscription* -- there are a few dozen (maybe a few hundred) who do that.
ECJ
for further information
The Pushed Pawn: You have to fight for your right to play chess!
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre.
Offline 
Send Email