Yes Kenny we can clearly see  you believe out with the bad guys  in with the good guys all is well and "End of story".  That's it right?  You are a short sighted pawn stealer.

Actually as criminal complaints  have been made on the matter the state  and federal  levels if they and even you did not and do not appropriately act it is quite possible one of you might get locked up  as the minimally the charge is called FRAUD, MAIL FRAUD, CONSPIRACY, VIOLATIONS OF THE TAX CODE, etc on a multiple count indictment that invokes "RICO" (no not my Puerto Rican Brudda)  so Mr. Channing is smart you and you are not.

Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act

And often the statute of limitations doesn't even start running in certain crimes. By the way your statement just llost you my support if you ever consider running for office again as I don't consider people who turn a blind eye to child molesting any better than child molesters, and PARENTS PLEASE NOTE:

What I reported occurred was not child molestation but child abuse  as I repeat all 50,000 scholastic members between 2000 and 2001 were defrauded out of issues to School Mates.... when the subscribers and membership subcribers had their subscriptions cut from 12 issues to 4 issues when School Mates went from a monthly to a quarterly, and all 50,000 scholastic members and School Mates subscribers did not have their subscriptions adjusted on a prorated basis ...Remember that cruddy magazine ... that I know about as I bought one for my nephew and half sister, and which as they don't play chess as they were deprived by people like you (Mr Ken ny Thomas). Do you want to see children treated like that?

It is criminal the way kids in the USCF were treated. I ask that each and every parent in the USCF, or with children in the USCF to mobilize, and organize.

Complain to the Internal Revenue Service, The Justice Dept., their state and local authorities, and to file complants in this matter as it appears to be the tip of the iceberg.

But why should I have to explain the issue many more times than once? What is the law on whistle blowers? too bad I wasn't a USCF employee to get fired then I could sue for damages.

Was that why 17 USCF employees were fired? Send me a list of the 17 USCF employees that were fired and I'll for one will investigate?

Though I have no aspiration for higher office if elected I will serve, and It should be remembered that the success or defeat in any election of power and person based efforst defeat is just that and unrepresentative of the social order and just that defeats for the power elites and individuals .... but socially until the last bonified dissenting USCF member is defeated you and the minions of evil will never represent the interests of the 20,000,000 chess players in America!

Have a nice day

for more info

~A~

The pushed Pawn

http://pushedpawn.org.

Ken Thomas <acn@...> wrote:

This is the biggest bunch of bologny that I have read lately. Mr. Channing, continue to do the good job that you and the elected board are doing and ignore these critics who represent no other member. I know of no member who shares their oppinion.

KT

 

----- Original Message -----

From: The Organization

To: USCF_Members@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2005 6:05 AM

Subject: [sloanschesslist] Re: If you are speaking of the Nov 16th-17th 2005 Exec Bd meeting

Mr. Channing:

 

Regarding your posting/s, upon study given sufficient time, the problems raised in what is made even more difficult by the regular posting of undated unclear documents on the websites of the USChess.org related to the issues, it has concluded that those matters referenced by you and I, must be further addressed publicly in that:

 

1. You say those issues were for discussion by the executive board in a November 2005 meeting, it is furthermore noticed that on the Nov 16th-17th 2005 Exec Bd meeting agenda, there is no indication that those matters will be actually scheduled to be discussed in any manner shape or form.

 

2. That the meeting listed was to be held in closed session, and if correct will not be clearly in the interests of the membership, preventing their study, and input, which will engender distrust and suspicion generally rather than good will.

 

3. In that you and the other executive Board members have not as of yet endeavored to address publicly those matters in some agressive appropiate and specific particular fashion, the membership has no reason to believe the issues will actually be appropiately addressed culminating in some affirmative result.

 

4. The only agenda reference found regarding an "Update on Chess Life changes, to incorporate changed emphasis as a result of cancellation of School Mates." which does not sufficiently address the issues as a matter of fact, information, and belief, to be indentifibly.

 

5. You have not further commented and as such presumed to be a party to the aforementioned acts.

in concerns raised, as specificly the board members have been publicly silent in what tends to lend weight and credibility to the thought/s and possibility that their position is that something wrong did not actually occur. That members were not cheated, and that the board will attempt to side track in some manner as the issues were something created by past administrations,  responsibly for which as a matter of principle is objected to in advance as unreassuing in sufficient and irresponsible.

 

Andrew Zito

http://pushedpawn.org

P.O.Box 1615

Altoona, Pa 16603