Good day all,
Quote from my legacy generated website:
"John married someone Mary Catherine FITZPATRICK, daughter of Charles
FITZPATRICK and......"
I cannot find where this 'someone' comes from, particularly when all the
relevant details are there, and how to get rid of it.
Thanks
Bryan
Christchurch NZ

That's a known problem and should be fixed in the next update.
Evert
To: WUL@...
From: bryannp@...
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 04:10:49 +0000
Subject: [WUL] Unwanted wording on webpage.




























       Good day all,

Quote from my legacy generated website:

"John married someone Mary Catherine FITZPATRICK, daughter of Charles
FITZPATRICK and......"

I cannot find where this 'someone' comes from, particularly when all the
relevant details are there, and how to get rid of it.

Thanks

Bryan

Christchurch NZ


















[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Bryan,

Evert may well be right, there certainly was such a bug, which I thought that it
had been resolved, but I may well be wrong. In any event it is worthwhile
checking that you have the latest update.

Nevertheless, there are other ways in which the wording can be introduced. the
Legacy web creation does not introduce the word "someone", and I suggest that
you check Options>Customise>Default Marriage Wording. I have changed mine so
that only "married", "partnered", "next had a partnership with" and "next
partnered" with no other wording are included, thus totally eliminating
"someone". You would also need to check the marriage wording on the Individual
Marriage Screen to ensure that the above global setting has changed that for
your couple.

Another point to check is that both partners have no other marriages i.e. a
ghost marriage. Check the Spouse Icons on Family view to see the number of
spouses, and I would also check both in the Marriage List. Having done all that
I would run Check/Repair until error free.

Finally you could try unlinking all the children and the spouse, then relink the
spouses first, followed by the kids. I none of the above works, then I think
that the bug is still present!


Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/



 
Visit My Websites at:
http://www.fergys.co.uk
and
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/


________________________________
  From: brymanz1 <bryannp@...>
To: WUL@...
Sent: Saturday, 28 January 2012, 4:10
Subject: [WUL] Unwanted wording on webpage.


 
Good day all,
Quote from my legacy generated website:
"John married someone Mary Catherine FITZPATRICK, daughter of Charles
FITZPATRICK and......"
I cannot find where this 'someone' comes from, particularly when all the
relevant details are there, and how to get rid of it.
Thanks
Bryan
Christchurch NZ




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

This was fixed in Beta 119 (see Mantis ID 3888). The General Release is still on
build 112, so it isn't fixed in the GR yet.
Evert

To: WUL@...
From: ronfergy2000@...
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 07:05:19 -0800
Subject: Re: [WUL] Unwanted wording on webpage.




























       Bryan,



Evert may well be right, there certainly was such a bug, which I thought that it
had been resolved, but I may well be wrong. In any event it is worthwhile
checking that you have the latest update.



Nevertheless, there are other ways in which the wording can be introduced. the
Legacy web creation does not introduce the word "someone", and I suggest that
you check Options>Customise>Default Marriage Wording. I have changed mine so
that only "married", "partnered", "next had a partnership with" and "next
partnered" with no other wording are included, thus totally eliminating
"someone". You would also need to check the marriage wording on the Individual
Marriage Screen to ensure that the above global setting has changed that for
your couple.



Another point to check is that both partners have no other marriages i.e. a
ghost marriage. Check the Spouse Icons on Family view to see the number of
spouses, and I would also check both in the Marriage List. Having done all that
I would run Check/Repair until error free.



Finally you could try unlinking all the children and the spouse, then relink the
spouses first, followed by the kids. I none of the above works, then I think
that the bug is still present!



Ron Ferguson

http://www.fergys.co.uk/





Visit My Websites at:

http://www.fergys.co.uk

and

http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/



________________________________

  From: brymanz1 <bryannp@...>

To: WUL@...

Sent: Saturday, 28 January 2012, 4:10

Subject: [WUL] Unwanted wording on webpage.







Good day all,

Quote from my legacy generated website:

"John married someone Mary Catherine FITZPATRICK, daughter of Charles
FITZPATRICK and......"

I cannot find where this 'someone' comes from, particularly when all the
relevant details are there, and how to get rid of it.

Thanks

Bryan

Christchurch NZ



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


















[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Thank you both for the replies. I've just searched my site and find that
"someone" occurs 70 times, all occasions as far as I can immediately see
even when a spouse is known. That's a third of my marriages.
The 'someone' seems to come from the Options>Customise>Default Marriage
Wording tab, so I have changed it at your suggestion.
I can't find the 'someone' wording appearing on the individual marriage
screen.
It only seems to appear on the web pages. I haven't checked reports.
I have the latest build of Legacy.
I would hazard a guess after a quick overview that it is happening in later
inputted marriages. So earlier pages are correct but later edited (in
Legacy) pages seem to have the extra word. I gather when you update your web
pages in Legacy that it will only change html pages if there's been any
editing since last.
Anyway I am going to update the site now and see what happens.
UPDATE: It still occurs. But the 'someone' is still in the Marriage wording
for these 70. So the Customize process above doesn't seem to globally change
everything. So the only thing seems to be to go through each individually.
Is this the bug you were talking about?

Thanks
Bryan

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Ronald Ferguson" <ronfergy2000@...>
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2012 4:05 AM
To: <WUL@...>
Subject: Re: [WUL] Unwanted wording on webpage.

> Bryan,
>
> Evert may well be right, there certainly was such a bug, which I thought
> that it had been resolved, but I may well be wrong. In any event it is
> worthwhile checking that you have the latest update.
>
> Nevertheless, there are other ways in which the wording can be introduced.
> the Legacy web creation does not introduce the word "someone", and I
> suggest that you check Options>Customise>Default Marriage Wording. I have
> changed mine so that only "married", "partnered", "next had a partnership
> with" and "next partnered" with no other wording are included, thus
> totally eliminating "someone". You would also need to check the marriage
> wording on the Individual Marriage Screen to ensure that the above global
> setting has changed that for your couple.
>
> Another point to check is that both partners have no other marriages i.e.
> a ghost marriage. Check the Spouse Icons on Family view to see the number
> of spouses, and I would also check both in the Marriage List. Having done
> all that I would run Check/Repair until error free.
>
> Finally you could try unlinking all the children and the spouse, then
> relink the spouses first, followed by the kids. I none of the above works,
> then I think that the bug is still present!
>
>
> Ron Ferguson
> http://www.fergys.co.uk/
>
>
>
>
> Visit My Websites at:
> http://www.fergys.co.uk
> and
> http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: brymanz1 <bryannp@...>
> To: WUL@...
> Sent: Saturday, 28 January 2012, 4:10
> Subject: [WUL] Unwanted wording on webpage.
>
>
>
> Good day all,
> Quote from my legacy generated website:
> "John married someone Mary Catherine FITZPATRICK, daughter of Charles
> FITZPATRICK and......"
> I cannot find where this 'someone' comes from, particularly when all the
> relevant details are there, and how to get rid of it.
> Thanks
> Bryan
> Christchurch NZ
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/WUL/
>
> If you have any questions about the group they may be answered in the FAQ
> in the Database
>
> If your question is still not answered please contact Ron at:
> webuserlegacy@...
>
> To unsubscribe please send a blank email to:
> wulunsubscribe@...
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

Hello again,
I'm sorry - it's me again! Could you have a look at this page?
http://tinyurl.com/7stsqpt
I'm wondering where the <> brackets come from. It only occurs in the
Location field and as you can see only in some instances. I cannot see any
difference in the original entries on the individual's Legacy page.
I have just done some more looking and it only seems to occur when there is
no death place recorded so Legacy uses the Burial place name. And it only
seems to appear on the alphabetical Name list, which is of course connected
to the Surname list.
Those who get their tongue around the Maori placenames get an extra prize!
Thanks
Bryan
Christchurch NZ

I think you've answered your own question there - the locations in
brackets are burial locations in place of missing death locations.
You'll need to look at the options available when you generate the pages
to see if this can be manipulated at all.

I'd be "cheating" (or at least have a significant advantage over many
others!) if I tried to collect the prize, so will leave it for someone
else!  ;-)

Kind Regards,
Wendy
Kaiwaka, New Zealand

Bryan said the following on 29/01/2012 4:28 p.m.:
> Hello again,
> I'm sorry - it's me again! Could you have a look at this page?
> http://tinyurl.com/7stsqpt
> I'm wondering where the<>  brackets come from. It only occurs in the
> Location field and as you can see only in some instances. I cannot see any
> difference in the original entries on the individual's Legacy page.
> I have just done some more looking and it only seems to occur when there is
> no death place recorded so Legacy uses the Burial place name. And it only
> seems to appear on the alphabetical Name list, which is of course connected
> to the Surname list.
> Those who get their tongue around the Maori placenames get an extra prize!
> Thanks
> Bryan
> Christchurch NZ

This is the bug report in Mantis (Legacy bug tracking system) and this bug is
fixed in beta build 119 (GR still on build 112 so it isn't fixed in the GR yet)

0003888: Marriage Wording - Gets stuck on Married someone after wife is added

Steps To Reproduce:
Create a new file
Add an Individual Jim Jones
Add a Father Jack by Right Clicking on the father section, Add a New Person
Move father to centre section
Click on Marriage Info line, Select Marriage wording
Screen shows the correct married someone for an unknown spouse
Save
Click on wife area and add a wife Betty Smith
Save
Marriage screen appears, select wording options

BUG1: The wording options still show married someone

Save
Reopen the marriage screen using the marriage info line

BUG2: The first marriage still says married someone but the subsequent marriage
correctly says next married

Evert

> From: bryannp@...
> To: WUL@...
> CC: ronfergy2000@...; evert1951@...
> Subject: Re: [WUL] Unwanted wording on webpage.
> Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 13:10:36 +1300
>
> Thank you both for the replies. I've just searched my site and find that
> "someone" occurs 70 times, all occasions as far as I can immediately see
> even when a spouse is known. That's a third of my marriages.
> The 'someone' seems to come from the Options>Customise>Default Marriage
> Wording tab, so I have changed it at your suggestion.
> I can't find the 'someone' wording appearing on the individual marriage
> screen.
> It only seems to appear on the web pages. I haven't checked reports.
> I have the latest build of Legacy.
> I would hazard a guess after a quick overview that it is happening in later
> inputted marriages. So earlier pages are correct but later edited (in
> Legacy) pages seem to have the extra word. I gather when you update your web
> pages in Legacy that it will only change html pages if there's been any
> editing since last.
> Anyway I am going to update the site now and see what happens.
> UPDATE: It still occurs. But the 'someone' is still in the Marriage wording
> for these 70. So the Customize process above doesn't seem to globally change
> everything. So the only thing seems to be to go through each individually.
> Is this the bug you were talking about?
>
> Thanks
> Bryan
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Ronald Ferguson" <ronfergy2000@...>
> Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2012 4:05 AM
> To: <WUL@...>
> Subject: Re: [WUL] Unwanted wording on webpage.
>
> > Bryan,
> >
> > Evert may well be right, there certainly was such a bug, which I thought
> > that it had been resolved, but I may well be wrong. In any event it is
> > worthwhile checking that you have the latest update.
> >
> > Nevertheless, there are other ways in which the wording can be introduced.
> > the Legacy web creation does not introduce the word "someone", and I
> > suggest that you check Options>Customise>Default Marriage Wording. I have
> > changed mine so that only "married", "partnered", "next had a partnership
> > with" and "next partnered" with no other wording are included, thus
> > totally eliminating "someone". You would also need to check the marriage
> > wording on the Individual Marriage Screen to ensure that the above global
> > setting has changed that for your couple.
> >
> > Another point to check is that both partners have no other marriages i.e.
> > a ghost marriage. Check the Spouse Icons on Family view to see the number
> > of spouses, and I would also check both in the Marriage List. Having done
> > all that I would run Check/Repair until error free.
> >
> > Finally you could try unlinking all the children and the spouse, then
> > relink the spouses first, followed by the kids. I none of the above works,
> > then I think that the bug is still present!
> >
> >
> > Ron Ferguson
> > http://www.fergys.co.uk/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Visit My Websites at:
> > http://www.fergys.co.uk
> > and
> > http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: brymanz1 <bryannp@...>
> > To: WUL@...
> > Sent: Saturday, 28 January 2012, 4:10
> > Subject: [WUL] Unwanted wording on webpage.
> >
> >
> >
> > Good day all,
> > Quote from my legacy generated website:
> > "John married someone Mary Catherine FITZPATRICK, daughter of Charles
> > FITZPATRICK and......"
> > I cannot find where this 'someone' comes from, particularly when all the
> > relevant details are there, and how to get rid of it.
> > Thanks
> > Bryan
> > Christchurch NZ
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > To visit your group on the web, go to:
> > http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/WUL/
> >
> > If you have any questions about the group they may be answered in the FAQ
> > in the Database
> >
> > If your question is still not answered please contact Ron at:
> > webuserlegacy@...
> >
> > To unsubscribe please send a blank email to:
> > wulunsubscribe@...
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Brian,

Your question has already been answered, but in case you have not picked it up,
you will alson find that where a Christening location is use to replace a birth
then angled brackets are again used.

Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/

 
Visit My Website at:
http://www.fergys.co.uk/


________________________________
  From: Bryan <bryannp@...>
To: WUL@...
Sent: Sunday, 29 January 2012, 3:28
Subject: [WUL] Unwanted brackets


 
Hello again,
I'm sorry - it's me again! Could you have a look at this page?
http://tinyurl.com/7stsqpt
I'm wondering where the <> brackets come from. It only occurs in the
Location field and as you can see only in some instances. I cannot see any
difference in the original entries on the individual's Legacy page.
I have just done some more looking and it only seems to occur when there is
no death place recorded so Legacy uses the Burial place name. And it only
seems to appear on the alphabetical Name list, which is of course connected
to the Surname list.
Those who get their tongue around the Maori placenames get an extra prize!
Thanks
Bryan
Christchurch NZ




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Evert,

Thank you for the information, I knew I had seen a revision somewhere, even if I
was unsure whether it had been on General Release.

Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/

 
Visit My Website at:
http://www.fergys.co.uk/

________________________________
From: Evert van Dijken <evert1951@...>
To: bryannp@...; WUL Legacy Website Groep <wul@...>
Cc: ronfergy2000@...
Sent: Sunday, 29 January 2012, 8:57
Subject: RE: [WUL] Unwanted wording on webpage.


 

This is the bug report in Mantis (Legacy bug tracking system) and this bug is
fixed in beta build 119 (GR still on build 112 so it isn't fixed in the GR yet)

0003888: Marriage Wording - Gets stuck on Married someone after wife is added

Steps To Reproduce:
Create a new file
Add an Individual Jim Jones
Add a Father Jack by Right Clicking on the father section, Add a New Person
Move father to centre section
Click on Marriage Info line, Select Marriage wording
Screen shows the correct married someone for an unknown spouse
Save
Click on wife area and add a wife Betty Smith
Save
Marriage screen appears, select wording options

BUG1: The wording options still show married someone

Save
Reopen the marriage screen using the marriage info line

BUG2: The first marriage still says married someone but the subsequent marriage
correctly says next married

Evert

> From: bryannp@...
> To: WUL@...
> CC: ronfergy2000@...; evert1951@...
> Subject: Re: [WUL] Unwanted wording on webpage.
> Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 13:10:36 +1300
>
> Thank you both for the replies. I've just searched my site and find that
> "someone" occurs 70 times, all occasions as far as I can immediately see
> even when a spouse is known. That's a third of my marriages.
> The 'someone' seems to come from the Options>Customise>Default Marriage
> Wording tab, so I have changed it at your suggestion.
> I can't find the 'someone' wording appearing on the individual marriage
> screen.
> It only seems to appear on the web pages. I haven't checked reports.
> I have the latest build of Legacy.
> I would hazard a guess after a quick overview that it is happening in later
> inputted marriages. So earlier pages are correct but later edited (in
> Legacy) pages seem to have the extra word. I gather when you update your web
> pages in Legacy that it will only change html pages if there's been any
> editing since last.
> Anyway I am going to update the site now and see what happens.
> UPDATE: It still occurs. But the 'someone' is still in the Marriage wording
> for these 70. So the Customize process above doesn't seem to globally change
> everything. So the only thing seems to be to go through each individually.
> Is this the bug you were talking about?
>
> Thanks
> Bryan
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Ronald Ferguson" <ronfergy2000@...>
> Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2012 4:05 AM
> To: <WUL@...>
> Subject: Re: [WUL] Unwanted wording on webpage.
>
> > Bryan,
> >
> > Evert may well be right, there certainly was such a bug, which I thought
> > that it had been resolved, but I may well be wrong. In any event it is
> > worthwhile checking that you have the latest update.
> >
> > Nevertheless, there are other ways in which the wording can be introduced.
> > the Legacy web creation does not introduce the word "someone", and I
> > suggest that you check Options>Customise>Default Marriage Wording. I have
> > changed mine so that only "married", "partnered", "next had a partnership
> > with" and "next partnered" with no other wording are included, thus
> > totally eliminating "someone". You would also need to check the marriage
> > wording on the Individual Marriage Screen to ensure that the above global
> > setting has changed that for your couple.
> >
> > Another point to check is that both partners have no other marriages i.e.
> > a ghost marriage. Check the Spouse Icons on Family view to see the number
> > of spouses, and I would also check both in the Marriage List. Having done
> > all that I would run Check/Repair until error free.
> >
> > Finally you could try unlinking all the children and the spouse, then
> > relink the spouses first, followed by the kids. I none of the above works,
> > then I think that the bug is still present!
> >
> >
> > Ron Ferguson
> > http://www.fergys.co.uk/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Visit My Websites at:
> > http://www.fergys.co.uk
> > and
> > http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: brymanz1 <bryannp@...>
> > To: WUL@...
> > Sent: Saturday, 28 January 2012, 4:10
> > Subject: [WUL] Unwanted wording on webpage.
> >
> >
> >
> > Good day all,
> > Quote from my legacy generated website:
> > "John married someone Mary Catherine FITZPATRICK, daughter of Charles
> > FITZPATRICK and......"
> > I cannot find where this 'someone' comes from, particularly when all the
> > relevant details are there, and how to get rid of it.
> > Thanks
> > Bryan
> > Christchurch NZ
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > To visit your group on the web, go to:
> > http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/WUL/
> >
> > If you have any questions about the group they may be answered in the FAQ
> > in the Database
> >
> > If your question is still not answered please contact Ron at:
> > webuserlegacy@...
> >
> > To unsubscribe please send a blank email to:
> > wulunsubscribe@...
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I'm using Legacy 7.5.0.112. I've now had some luck with my website on space
provided by my ISP but as you can see there are display problems on a page
created by manually uploading the files created by Legacy.
http://home.comcast.net/~clarker2/site/?/page/Descendants_of_David_Barton_Kinne/


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

On Thu, 2 Feb 2012 07:54:31 -0500, Randy Clark <ceddacosco@...>
wrote:

>I'm using Legacy 7.5.0.112. I've now had some luck with my website on space
>provided by my ISP but as you can see there are display problems on a page
>created by manually uploading the files created by Legacy.
>http://home.comcast.net/~clarker2/site/?/page/Descendants_of_David_Barton_Kinne\
/
>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

As you can see, your post got truncated. I am guessing that the rest of
your post contained HTML code which Yahoo barfed on.

I have looked at the page at the above link. Are you using some sort of
CMS (Content Management System)? After looking at the page source and
googling around a little it appears you are using Comcast's Personal Web
Pages (PWP). I assume they provide some sort of "page builder" tool for
you to use.

By the looks of the source, it looks like you went to the Comcast "page
builder" tool and pasted in the HTML source from an entire Legacy
generated page. You are not going to be able to integrate your Legacy
created web pages within PWP in this manner. Legacy web pages are
standalone. My guess is that you will have to upload your Legacy web
pages to a separate area (maybe a /genealogy/ folder under ~clarker2)
and then use whatever "page builder" tool Comcast provides to create a
PWP page that links to your Legacy built home page (or just make the
"Descendants of David Barton Kinne" menu item jump directly to
~clarker2/genealogy/ when pressed.

I can't offer much more help without more knowledge of you ISP's setup.

--

Dennis Kowallek (LTools/Custom Programming)
dennis@...
http://zippersoftware.com/ltools/index.htm
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ltools

Dennis,

Thanks for answering. My ISP's (Comcast) page builder is cumbersome and
their tech support is less than helpful. Rather than copy & paste I
attempted to upload the files from the C:\Legacy\Web folder to a
subdirectory of my clarker2 site. I did later successfully load a pdf to a
folder (misc) to this site.
I'm off to my eye appointment now. Perhaps I'll see more clearly when I
return.

On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Dennis Kowallek <kowallek@...> wrote:

> **
>
>
> On Thu, 2 Feb 2012 07:54:31 -0500, Randy Clark <ceddacosco@...>
> wrote:
>
>
> >I'm using Legacy 7.5.0.112. I've now had some luck with my website on
> space
> >provided by my ISP but as you can see there are display problems on a page
> >created by manually uploading the files created by Legacy.
> >
>
http://home.comcast.net/~clarker2/site/?/page/Descendants_of_David_Barton_Kinne/
> >
> >
> >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> As you can see, your post got truncated. I am guessing that the rest of
> your post contained HTML code which Yahoo barfed on.
>
> I have looked at the page at the above link. Are you using some sort of
> CMS (Content Management System)? After looking at the page source and
> googling around a little it appears you are using Comcast's Personal Web
> Pages (PWP). I assume they provide some sort of "page builder" tool for
> you to use.
>
> By the looks of the source, it looks like you went to the Comcast "page
> builder" tool and pasted in the HTML source from an entire Legacy
> generated page. You are not going to be able to integrate your Legacy
> created web pages within PWP in this manner. Legacy web pages are
> standalone. My guess is that you will have to upload your Legacy web
> pages to a separate area (maybe a /genealogy/ folder under ~clarker2)
> and then use whatever "page builder" tool Comcast provides to create a
> PWP page that links to your Legacy built home page (or just make the
> "Descendants of David Barton Kinne" menu item jump directly to
> ~clarker2/genealogy/ when pressed.
>
> I can't offer much more help without more knowledge of you ISP's setup.
>
> --
>
> Dennis Kowallek (LTools/Custom Programming)
> dennis@...
> http://zippersoftware.com/ltools/index.htm
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ltools
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

On Thu, 2 Feb 2012 08:49:40 -0500, Randy Clark <ceddacosco@...>
wrote:

>Thanks for answering. My ISP's (Comcast) page builder is cumbersome and
>their tech support is less than helpful. Rather than copy & paste I
>attempted to upload the files from the C:\Legacy\Web folder to a
>subdirectory of my clarker2 site. I did later successfully load a pdf to a
>folder (misc) to this site.

OK. Then the subdir (let's assume you called it "genealogy") should have
a file in it called index.htm (or .html). Now all you need to do is...

	 * Change the "Descendants of David Barton Kinne" menu item to point
	   to http://home.comcast.net/~clarker2/genealogy/. I have no idea how
	   you would do this in Comcast's page builder.

-or-

	 * Change the
http://home.comcast.net/~clarker2/site/?/page/Descendants_of_David_Barton_Kinne/
	   page with the page builder to just contain a link to
	   http://home.comcast.net/~clarker2/genealogy/.

--

Dennis Kowallek (LTools/Custom Programming)
dennis@...
http://zippersoftware.com/ltools/index.htm
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ltools

I use my ISP-provided webpage to load my Legacy website. I've used Page
Breeze as builder. I have a main page made from a free template in a Parrott
directory, which is then spilt off into a Parrott2 sub-directory and a Bell
subdirectory. The main page is here
http://tinyurl.com/ykwrgkz
The Parrott directory has pdf's, and links to internal pages as well as
external.
Hope this helps.
Bryan


--------------------------------------------------
From: "Randy Clark" <ceddacosco@...>
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 1:54 AM
To: <WUL@...>
Subject: [WUL] web site display

> I'm using Legacy 7.5.0.112. I've now had some luck with my website on
> space
> provided by my ISP but as you can see there are display problems on a page
> created by manually uploading the files created by Legacy.
>
http://home.comcast.net/~clarker2/site/?/page/Descendants_of_David_Barton_Kinne/

A word of caution!

I have just downloaded the new version of Legacy (7.5.0.142) and found that my
Pedigree Webpage settings have been overwritten by the Legacy default. To
restore them will take an awful lot of work. I now understand that this may
happen from time to time with any update, so I strongly recommend that a back-up
of these is saved to somewhere safe, They are not saved in the normal back-up.

The files are of the form *.wf0, where the '*' is a name which you have chosen.

Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Correction!!

Sorry about the typo the file name is *.wf0

Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/


________________________________
  From: Ronald Ferguson <ronfergy2000@...>
To: WUL <wul@...>
Sent: Friday, 3 February 2012, 22:05
Subject: [WUL] Pedigree Web Pages


 
A word of caution!

I have just downloaded the new version of Legacy (7.5.0.142) and found that my
Pedigree Webpage settings have been overwritten by the Legacy default. To
restore them will take an awful lot of work. I now understand that this may
happen from time to time with any update, so I strongly recommend that a back-up
of these is saved to somewhere safe, They are not saved in the normal back-up.

The files are of the form *.wf0, where the '*' is a name which you have chosen.

Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Sorry, again, but something weird is happening!!

The correct file should be *.wf0 ie. *.wfzero

Ron Ferguson

 
http://www.fergys.co.uk/


________________________________
  From: Ronald Ferguson <ronfergy2000@...>
To: "WUL@..." <WUL@...>
Sent: Friday, 3 February 2012, 22:08
Subject: Re: [WUL] Pedigree Web Pages


 
Correction!!

Sorry about the typo the file name is *.wf0

Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/

________________________________
From: Ronald Ferguson <ronfergy2000@...>
To: WUL <wul@...>
Sent: Friday, 3 February 2012, 22:05
Subject: [WUL] Pedigree Web Pages


 
A word of caution!

I have just downloaded the new version of Legacy (7.5.0.142) and found that my
Pedigree Webpage settings have been overwritten by the Legacy default. To
restore them will take an awful lot of work. I now understand that this may
happen from time to time with any update, so I strongly recommend that a back-up
of these is saved to somewhere safe, They are not saved in the normal back-up.

The files are of the form *.wf0, where the '*' is a name which you have chosen.

Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 14:05:47 -0800 (PST), Ronald Ferguson
<ronfergy2000@...> wrote:

>I have just downloaded the new version of Legacy (7.5.0.142) and found that my
Pedigree Webpage settings have been overwritten by the Legacy default. To
restore them will take an awful lot of work. I now understand that this may
happen from time to time with any update, so I strongly recommend that a back-up
of these is saved to somewhere safe, They are not saved in the normal back-up.

Did they change something in the file's format that required them to
start from scratch?

--

Dennis Kowallek (LTools/Custom Programming)
dennis@...
http://zippersoftware.com/ltools/index.htm
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ltools

Dennis,

I don't actually know. All that is published is a number of amendments:

"Added a new option on the Misc. tab to include custom HTML or Script to the 
section of each document.
Changed the Document type back to HTML instead of XTML
Fixed a few html coding items"

The latter is not very helpful, and I will be going through the output to see
what the changes are!

However, coming back to your question Wm reports that his saved settings have
not been affected, so it looks as though it's my turn to be unlucky.


Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/


________________________________
  From: Dennis Kowallek <kowallek@...>
To: WUL@...
Sent: Friday, 3 February 2012, 22:31
Subject: Re: [WUL] Pedigree Web Pages


 
On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 14:05:47 -0800 (PST), Ronald Ferguson
<ronfergy2000@...> wrote:

>I have just downloaded the new version of Legacy (7.5.0.142) and found that my
Pedigree Webpage settings have been overwritten by the Legacy default. To
restore them will take an awful lot of work. I now understand that this may
happen from time to time with any update, so I strongly recommend that a back-up
of these is saved to somewhere safe, They are not saved in the normal back-up.

Did they change something in the file's format that required them to
start from scratch?

--

Dennis Kowallek (LTools/Custom Programming)
dennis@...
http://zippersoftware.com/ltools/index.htm
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ltools



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

All my settings were overwritten also, but fortunately I had a backup .wf0
from my last create but I don't remember making one! So I did a Load from
the Create Web Page window.
Bryan

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Ronald Ferguson" <ronfergy2000@...>
Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2012 11:40 AM
To: <WUL@...>
Subject: Re: [WUL] Pedigree Web Pages

> Dennis,
>
> I don't actually know. All that is published is a number of amendments:
>
> "Added a new option on the Misc. tab to include custom HTML or Script to
> the  section of each document.
> Changed the Document type back to HTML instead of XTML
> Fixed a few html coding items"
>
> The latter is not very helpful, and I will be going through the output to
> see what the changes are!
>
> However, coming back to your question Wm reports that his saved settings
> have not been affected, so it looks as though it's my turn to be unlucky.
>
>
> Ron Ferguson
> http://www.fergys.co.uk/
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Dennis Kowallek <kowallek@...>
> To: WUL@...
> Sent: Friday, 3 February 2012, 22:31
> Subject: Re: [WUL] Pedigree Web Pages
>
>
>
> On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 14:05:47 -0800 (PST), Ronald Ferguson
> <ronfergy2000@...> wrote:
>
>>I have just downloaded the new version of Legacy (7.5.0.142) and found
>>that my Pedigree Webpage settings have been overwritten by the Legacy
>>default. To restore them will take an awful lot of work. I now understand
>>that this may happen from time to time with any update, so I strongly
>>recommend that a back-up of these is saved to somewhere safe, They are not
>>saved in the normal back-up.
>
> Did they change something in the file's format that required them to
> start from scratch?
>
> --
>
> Dennis Kowallek (LTools/Custom Programming)
> dennis@...
> http://zippersoftware.com/ltools/index.htm
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ltools
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/WUL/
>
> If you have any questions about the group they may be answered in the FAQ
> in the Database
>
> If your question is still not answered please contact Ron at:
> webuserlegacy@...
>
> To unsubscribe please send a blank email to:
> wulunsubscribe@...
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 14:40:22 -0800 (PST), Ronald Ferguson
<ronfergy2000@...> wrote:

>I don't actually know. All that is published is a number of amendments:
>
>"Added a new option on the Misc. tab to include custom HTML or Script to the 
section of each document.
>Changed the Document type back to HTML instead of XTML
>Fixed a few html coding items"
>
>The latter is not very helpful, and I will be going through the output to see
what the changes are!

Let me know if the changes create any problems with LTools.

--

Dennis Kowallek (LTools/Custom Programming)
dennis@...
http://zippersoftware.com/ltools/index.htm
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ltools

Will do Dennis, it was one of my thoughts also. I hope to do a full evaluation
tomorrow- I'm trying to fit a new bathroom light fixture at present -
unfortunately it's not designed for my installation, so much adaptation
required!!

Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/

 
Visit My Websites at:
http://www.fergys.co.uk
and
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/


________________________________
  From: Dennis Kowallek <kowallek@...>
To: WUL@...
Sent: Saturday, 4 February 2012, 14:26
Subject: Re: [WUL] Pedigree Web Pages


 
On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 14:40:22 -0800 (PST), Ronald Ferguson
<ronfergy2000@...> wrote:

>I don't actually know. All that is published is a number of amendments:
>
>"Added a new option on the Misc. tab to include custom HTML or Script to the 
section of each document.
>Changed the Document type back to HTML instead of XTML
>Fixed a few html coding items"
>
>The latter is not very helpful, and I will be going through the output to see
what the changes are!

Let me know if the changes create any problems with LTools.

--

Dennis Kowallek (LTools/Custom Programming)
dennis@...
http://zippersoftware.com/ltools/index.htm
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ltools



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Dennis, the only obvious change which I have seen so far is that the colours are
now put in quotes ie 'bgcolor=#FFFFFF' is now 'bgcolor="#FFFFFF"', which I
expected to make no difference to the LTools output, and nor does it.

I also seem to remember that the insertion of the word "unknown" for an unnamed
individual when web creation/reports is set to 'leave blank' is no longer the
case, but I would not expect this to make any difference.

(As an aside - it seems to have corrupted one of my picture file names, no doubt
I will sort that out!)

I will be back in touch if anything else crops up.

Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/


________________________________
  From: Dennis Kowallek <kowallek@...>
To: WUL@...
Sent: Saturday, 4 February 2012, 14:26
Subject: Re: [WUL] Pedigree Web Pages


 
On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 14:40:22 -0800 (PST), Ronald Ferguson
<ronfergy2000@...> wrote:

>I don't actually know. All that is published is a number of amendments:
>
>"Added a new option on the Misc. tab to include custom HTML or Script to the 
section of each document.
>Changed the Document type back to HTML instead of XTML
>Fixed a few html coding items"
>
>The latter is not very helpful, and I will be going through the output to see
what the changes are!

Let me know if the changes create any problems with LTools.

--

Dennis Kowallek (LTools/Custom Programming)
dennis@...
http://zippersoftware.com/ltools/index.htm
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ltools



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I was wrong about the elimination of the "unknown", I very much regret to say
that they are still there!!

Ron Ferguson

http://www.fergys.co.uk/

________________________________
From: Ronald Ferguson <ronfergy2000@...>
To: "WUL@..." <WUL@...>
Sent: Sunday, 5 February 2012, 15:38
Subject: Re: [WUL] Pedigree Web Pages


 
Dennis, the only obvious change which I have seen so far is that the colours are
now put in quotes ie 'bgcolor=#FFFFFF' is now 'bgcolor="#FFFFFF"', which I
expected to make no difference to the LTools output, and nor does it.

I also seem to remember that the insertion of the word "unknown" for an unnamed
individual when web creation/reports is set to 'leave blank' is no longer the
case, but I would not expect this to make any difference.

(As an aside - it seems to have corrupted one of my picture file names, no doubt
I will sort that out!)

I will be back in touch if anything else crops up.

Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/

________________________________
From: Dennis Kowallek <kowallek@...>
To: WUL@...
Sent: Saturday, 4 February 2012, 14:26
Subject: Re: [WUL] Pedigree Web Pages


 
On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 14:40:22 -0800 (PST), Ronald Ferguson
<ronfergy2000@...> wrote:

>I don't actually know. All that is published is a number of amendments:
>
>"Added a new option on the Misc. tab to include custom HTML or Script to the 
section of each document.
>Changed the Document type back to HTML instead of XTML
>Fixed a few html coding items"
>
>The latter is not very helpful, and I will be going through the output to see
what the changes are!

Let me know if the changes create any problems with LTools.

--

Dennis Kowallek (LTools/Custom Programming)
dennis@...
http://zippersoftware.com/ltools/index.htm
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ltools

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Ran a few dozen pages with an assortment of custom item, including
google tracker script in the new custom head section. The only errors I
see are those generated by Legacy.

Wm Voss

On 05-Feb-12 10:05 AM, Ronald Ferguson wrote:
> I was wrong about the elimination of the "unknown", I very much regret to say
that they are still there!!
>
> Ron Ferguson
>
> http://www.fergys.co.uk/
>
> ________________________________
> From: Ronald Ferguson<ronfergy2000@...>
> To: "WUL@..."<WUL@...>
> Sent: Sunday, 5 February 2012, 15:38
> Subject: Re: [WUL] Pedigree Web Pages
>
>
>
> Dennis, the only obvious change which I have seen so far is that the colours
are now put in quotes ie 'bgcolor=#FFFFFF' is now 'bgcolor="#FFFFFF"', which I
expected to make no difference to the LTools output, and nor does it.
>
> I also seem to remember that the insertion of the word "unknown" for an
unnamed individual when web creation/reports is set to 'leave blank' is no
longer the case, but I would not expect this to make any difference.
>
> (As an aside - it seems to have corrupted one of my picture file names, no
doubt I will sort that out!)
>
> I will be back in touch if anything else crops up.
>
> Ron Ferguson
> http://www.fergys.co.uk/
>
> ________________________________
> From: Dennis Kowallek<kowallek@...>
> To: WUL@...
> Sent: Saturday, 4 February 2012, 14:26
> Subject: Re: [WUL] Pedigree Web Pages
>
>
>
> On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 14:40:22 -0800 (PST), Ronald Ferguson
> <ronfergy2000@...>  wrote:
>
>> I don't actually know. All that is published is a number of amendments:
>>
>> "Added a new option on the Misc. tab to include custom HTML or Script to the 
section of each document.
>> Changed the Document type back to HTML instead of XTML
>> Fixed a few html coding items"
>>
>> The latter is not very helpful, and I will be going through the output to see
what the changes are!
> Let me know if the changes create any problems with LTools.
>

Wm,

That confirms my experience. I have not tried the custom header, when used with
Ltools with an additional header(s) created by oneself does that work OK or have
you not tested that?

Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/


________________________________
  From: Wm Voss <bellafortuni@...>
To: WUL@...
Sent: Sunday, 5 February 2012, 22:19
Subject: Re: [WUL] Pedigree Web Pages


 
Ran a few dozen pages with an assortment of custom item, including
google tracker script in the new custom head section. The only errors I
see are those generated by Legacy.

Wm Voss

On 05-Feb-12 10:05 AM, Ronald Ferguson wrote:
> I was wrong about the elimination of the "unknown", I very much regret to say
that they are still there!!
>
> Ron Ferguson
>
> http://www.fergys.co.uk/
>
> ________________________________
> From: Ronald Ferguson<ronfergy2000@...>
> To: "WUL@..."<WUL@...>
> Sent: Sunday, 5 February 2012, 15:38
> Subject: Re: [WUL] Pedigree Web Pages
>
>
>
> Dennis, the only obvious change which I have seen so far is that the colours
are now put in quotes ie 'bgcolor=#FFFFFF' is now 'bgcolor="#FFFFFF"', which I
expected to make no difference to the LTools output, and nor does it.
>
> I also seem to remember that the insertion of the word "unknown" for an
unnamed individual when web creation/reports is set to 'leave blank' is no
longer the case, but I would not expect this to make any difference.
>
> (As an aside - it seems to have corrupted one of my picture file names, no
doubt I will sort that out!)
>
> I will be back in touch if anything else crops up.
>
> Ron Ferguson
> http://www.fergys.co.uk/
>
> ________________________________
> From: Dennis Kowallek<kowallek@...>
> To: WUL@...
> Sent: Saturday, 4 February 2012, 14:26
> Subject: Re: [WUL] Pedigree Web Pages
>
>
>
> On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 14:40:22 -0800 (PST), Ronald Ferguson
> <ronfergy2000@...>  wrote:
>
>> I don't actually know. All that is published is a number of amendments:
>>
>> "Added a new option on the Misc. tab to include custom HTML or Script to the 
section of each document.
>> Changed the Document type back to HTML instead of XTML
>> Fixed a few html coding items"
>>
>> The latter is not very helpful, and I will be going through the output to see
what the changes are!
> Let me know if the changes create any problems with LTools.
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I have both custom headers and footers on each page, but those are
outside the head, so there isn't (and shouldn't be) an issue, at least
as I have tested with the google bit.

I am at a loss to see what Ken's vaunted "fixes" were. I do see all the
old familiar issues. . .

Wm

On 05-Feb-12 5:09 PM, Ronald Ferguson wrote:
> Wm,
>
> That confirms my experience. I have not tried the custom header, when used
with Ltools with an additional header(s) created by oneself does that work OK or
have you not tested that?
>
> Ron Ferguson
> http://www.fergys.co.uk/
>
>
> ________________________________
>   From: Wm Voss<bellafortuni@...>
> To: WUL@...
> Sent: Sunday, 5 February 2012, 22:19
> Subject: Re: [WUL] Pedigree Web Pages
>
>
> Â
> Ran a few dozen pages with an assortment of custom item, including
> google tracker script in the new custom head section. The only errors I
> see are those generated by Legacy.
>
> Wm Voss
>
> On 05-Feb-12 10:05 AM, Ronald Ferguson wrote:
>> I was wrong about the elimination of the "unknown", I very much regret to say
that they are still there!!
>>
>> Ron Ferguson
>>
>> http://www.fergys.co.uk/
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Ronald Ferguson<ronfergy2000@...>
>> To: "WUL@..."<WUL@...>
>> Sent: Sunday, 5 February 2012, 15:38
>> Subject: Re: [WUL] Pedigree Web Pages
>>
>>
>>
>> Dennis, the only obvious change which I have seen so far is that the colours
are now put in quotes ie 'bgcolor=#FFFFFF' is now 'bgcolor="#FFFFFF"', which I
expected to make no difference to the LTools output, and nor does it.
>>
>> I also seem to remember that the insertion of the word "unknown" for an
unnamed individual when web creation/reports is set to 'leave blank' is no
longer the case, but I would not expect this to make any difference.
>>
>> (As an aside - it seems to have corrupted one of my picture file names, no
doubt I will sort that out!)
>>
>> I will be back in touch if anything else crops up.
>>
>> Ron Ferguson
>> http://www.fergys.co.uk/
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Dennis Kowallek<kowallek@...>
>> To: WUL@...
>> Sent: Saturday, 4 February 2012, 14:26
>> Subject: Re: [WUL] Pedigree Web Pages
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 14:40:22 -0800 (PST), Ronald Ferguson
>> <ronfergy2000@...>   wrote:
>>
>>> I don't actually know. All that is published is a number of amendments:
>>>
>>> "Added a new option on the Misc. tab to include custom HTML or Script to the
section of each document.
>>> Changed the Document type back to HTML instead of XTML
>>> Fixed a few html coding items"
>>>
>>> The latter is not very helpful, and I will be going through the output to
see what the changes are!
>> Let me know if the changes create any problems with LTools.
>>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/WUL/
>
> If you have any questions about the group they may be answered in the FAQ in
the Database
>
> If your question is still not answered please contact Ron at:
> webuserlegacy@...
>
> To unsubscribe please send a blank email to:
> wulunsubscribe@...
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

OK, Wm, I'll have a look at sticking something in the head tomorrow (later today
actually!).

I agree with your last comment; I ran a full site of over 5000 pages and all I
have found is the quotes around the colours!

Ron Ferguson

http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/


________________________________
  From: Wm Voss <bellafortuni@...>
To: WUL@...
Sent: Monday, 6 February 2012, 1:14
Subject: Re: [WUL] Pedigree Web Pages


 
I have both custom headers and footers on each page, but those are
outside the head, so there isn't (and shouldn't be) an issue, at least
as I have tested with the google bit.

I am at a loss to see what Ken's vaunted "fixes" were. I do see all the
old familiar issues. . .

Wm

On 05-Feb-12 5:09 PM, Ronald Ferguson wrote:
> Wm,
>
> That confirms my experience. I have not tried the custom header, when used
with Ltools with an additional header(s) created by oneself does that work OK or
have you not tested that?
>
> Ron Ferguson
> http://www.fergys.co.uk/
>
>
> ________________________________
>   From: Wm Voss<bellafortuni@...>
> To: WUL@...
> Sent: Sunday, 5 February 2012, 22:19
> Subject: Re: [WUL] Pedigree Web Pages
>
>
> Â
> Ran a few dozen pages with an assortment of custom item, including
> google tracker script in the new custom head section. The only errors I
> see are those generated by Legacy.
>
> Wm Voss
>
> On 05-Feb-12 10:05 AM, Ronald Ferguson wrote:
>> I was wrong about the elimination of the "unknown", I very much regret to say
that they are still there!!
>>
>> Ron Ferguson
>>
>> http://www.fergys.co.uk/
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Ronald Ferguson<ronfergy2000@...>
>> To: "WUL@..."<WUL@...>
>> Sent: Sunday, 5 February 2012, 15:38
>> Subject: Re: [WUL] Pedigree Web Pages
>>
>>
>>
>> Dennis, the only obvious change which I have seen so far is that the colours
are now put in quotes ie 'bgcolor=#FFFFFF' is now 'bgcolor="#FFFFFF"', which I
expected to make no difference to the LTools output, and nor does it.
>>
>> I also seem to remember that the insertion of the word "unknown" for an
unnamed individual when web creation/reports is set to 'leave blank' is no
longer the case, but I would not expect this to make any difference.
>>
>> (As an aside - it seems to have corrupted one of my picture file names, no
doubt I will sort that out!)
>>
>> I will be back in touch if anything else crops up.
>>
>> Ron Ferguson
>> http://www.fergys.co.uk/
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Dennis Kowallek<kowallek@...>
>> To: WUL@...
>> Sent: Saturday, 4 February 2012, 14:26
>> Subject: Re: [WUL] Pedigree Web Pages
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 14:40:22 -0800 (PST), Ronald Ferguson
>> <ronfergy2000@...>   wrote:
>>
>>> I don't actually know. All that is published is a number of amendments:
>>>
>>> "Added a new option on the Misc. tab to include custom HTML or Script to the
section of each document.
>>> Changed the Document type back to HTML instead of XTML
>>> Fixed a few html coding items"
>>>
>>> The latter is not very helpful, and I will be going through the output to
see what the changes are!
>> Let me know if the changes create any problems with LTools.
>>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/WUL/
>
> If you have any questions about the group they may be answered in the FAQ in
the Database
>
> If your question is still not answered please contact Ron at:
> webuserlegacy@...
>
> To unsubscribe please send a blank email to:
> wulunsubscribe@...
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Ron, I've just been browsing your family file. Always come to the oracle I was
told!!
I notice you use the titles Mr, Mrs, Miss. I do like the idea for the females. I
find either unknown or blank not useful and if the person has a double first
name one can never be sure whether the last name is part of the first name or a
surname.
Legacy doesn't like you entering a title on an individual's input page, although
it does seem to let you do it.
Quote:"Standardisation Tip. Name Prefix:
Mr., Mrs., Ms., Miss, Madame, etc. should not be entered into a name field. 
They are not part of the person's name." Why then is the title field there then?

My question is: do you use the title as part of an AKA input? or do you put Miss
initially in the individual's input page and then do an AKA for Mrs? Or?
Regards and thanks
Bryan
Christchurch NZ (Only 40 earthquakes this week!)