Mathew said (message 90):
"We shall continue to be angry about this and speak out publicly
against St James, St Vedast, the SES, and all of it's affiliated
organisations (including those that continue to support, sponsor and
fund it), until some kind of justice is done."

Now I am not the most intelligent girl in the world, but from what
Mathew said there it seems that if he is going to be angry at St
James (etc.) then it must mean he has a issue with St James? However
in his most recent post he says:

"But finally I must reiterate, we have no issue at all with today's
St James, or in no way wish to harm it's reputation."

Now I am confused, this isn't the only points that you have made
which you later have just said the opposite of the original. I could
go through all your posts again and copy and past a lot of things,
but that would be time consuming and would be quite boring for the
rest of us to read. So what I am trying to say is why can you not
stick to your points?

Mathew also said:
"As for our aims, we are currently in talks with SES and St James
hierarchy in an attempt to resolve this issue. It is in the
interests of all concerned to put this behind us and move on."

What were you aims? I don't know if you have already stated your
aims in bullet points, but if you haven't then can you do so just so
that we all know what the aims are.
If it is in the interest of all of you to put this all behind you
then why are you all still going on about it?
"The best way forward is to forgive and forget the wrong doings of
their past, that is the way forward to a prospers future for all"
I am not saying that the past doesn't matter, but the only way you
can put all that behind, as you Mathew said that you wanted to do,
is to try to forget about and get on with your lives, it must be
hard to forget about it but telling your stories over and over again
and reading about other peoples stories doesn't really help.