Catharine Stott wrote:
> Re: chocolate factory consultation
> And if you feel very strongly that the council is using a biased and
> flawed consultation document, and are wondering what on earth makes
> the ecological report on the two pieces of land so sensitive that the
> council refuses to publish it and think this also is not good enough,
> then you can complain to the public sector ombudsman at
> http://www.lgo.org.uk/.
>
> After all once that land's gone, it's gone forever, and it sets a
> great precedent for selling off more pieces of green corridor in Bristol.
>
> Catharine Stott
I read it that Squarepeg wants access paths to it's cycle houses, across
the 'pieces of land', in return for which it proposes to landscape and
maintain them. I don't think they're going anywhere, in fact I'm
certain that these strips of Victorian railway embankment will remain
exactly where they are.

Having said which I agree the "consultation" is a pathetic shambles and
I object to paying for it.
In any case BCC will probably conclude, as usual, that it would be
sacreligeous to disturb these pieces of land in any way that might
disturb their "essentially rural nature" :-D

Royce






>