Good point Darryl, and as this project doesn't directly affect me, I'm only offering my honest opinion. Just as you have kindly done for me in the past.

I've learned that if one must explain, then "it" might not be doing the intended job. Perhaps the two of us who responded are only doing so out of ignorance, or perhaps as an artist its sometimes hard to see through different eyes. Whatever the case, clarity is a good idea, and seeking additional feedback may not be a bad move. Again, I think everything else turned out extremely well. This was my only suggestion as something that didn't quite stand out right to me. I don't think it's bad by any means, I just think it interrupts the flow and might be a little confusing to some.

p.s. By natural, I meant the illustrated picture. Yes, it's not a photograph, but it represents elements of nature: tree, bushes, sky, house, stars, moon, grass, etc. All elements of earthly nature, and even though it's a little cartoony, it's done in the sense of "realism". But as you say, this isn't an issue since you are using a different method towards a different goal. I just wanted to clarify my point as to not cause confusion.