Sign In
New User? Sign Up
learning-science-concepts · Regarding aspects of learners' scientific conceptions; understanding the learning process; and facilitating science learning.
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
You can search the group for older messages.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
lower school science   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #627 of 899 |
Re: lower school science

Regarding lower school science

I have experience of both scenarios.

For me, the advantages of 'separate science' teaching are in use of subject
specialist teachers. ie chemists, biologists and physicists teaching their own
disciplines.

It is much easier to avoid introduction of misconceptions when teaching a
subject that you also teach up to A level/18. As a chemistry teacher, I can
avoid some of the crazy KS3 National Curriculum ideas (eg solubility always
increases with temperature, chemical changes are irreversible, particles in a
liquid have spaces inbetween them etc.) When I have taught physics and biology
to KS3 I am sure I have been less effective. I might have covered the
curriculum, but not set the best foundation for GCSE, A level and beyond.

So many KS3/NC curriculum resources - text books etc are packed with errors and
misconceptions. When teaching out of your own subject area, the tendency is to
rely much more on these resources and to be less discriminatory about what and
how you teach.

The challenge for all us science teachers is to simplify content without helping
pupils build models based on misconceptions. Pupils hate it when GCSE and A
level teachers subsequently tell them to 'unlearn' previously held ideas.

For these reasons I would advocate 'subject specialists' teaching chem, Phys and
Bio from Y7/age 11,.

Gail Lydford
----- Original Message -----
From: layhomer
To: learning-science-concepts@...
Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2005 12:16 PM
Subject: LSC: lower school science



Has any any views or research on the benefits of Lower school science
compared to separatres science teacing.

We currently teach sciences separately throughout the school. We
will be discussing whether science should be taught lower down. But
to help with this decision I would like to receive
views/experiences/actual research.


Many thanks


andrew hammersley





About this list:

Purpose: an international forum for discussing aspects of learning in science,
and for circulating news about publications, projects, etc., related to this
theme.

Membership: open to teachers at any level, researchers into learning in
science and related fields, and any others interested in the topic.

This list gives you the choice of receiving e-mails individually, or as a
single daily digest of all messages circulated that day.

homepage:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/learning-science-concepts/
bookmarks to other sites:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/learning-science-concepts/links
bibliography on learning in science
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/learning-science-concepts/files/

This list is a moderated discussion group (ie postings are vetted for
relevance to the group theme).

Moderator: Dr. Keith Taber, Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge.
http://www.educ.cam.ac.uk/staff/taber.html


to join an un-moderated general science education discussion list, please
visit:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/science-education/




Yahoo! Groups Sponsor



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/learning-science-concepts/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
learning-science-concepts-unsubscribe@...

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Sun Jan 23, 2005 10:29 am

g_lydford
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #627 of 899 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Has any any views or research on the benefits of Lower school science compared to separatres science teacing. We currently teach sciences separately throughout...
layhomer
Offline Send Email
Jan 22, 2005
1:25 pm

Regarding lower school science I have experience of both scenarios. For me, the advantages of 'separate science' teaching are in use of subject specialist...
Gail LYDFORD
g_lydford
Offline Send Email
Jan 23, 2005
1:48 pm

Gail makes important points with regard to lower school science. I can see that ther is a logic when teaching a subject such as energy to link across the...
Ian Taylor
taylor177ian
Offline Send Email
Jan 23, 2005
10:02 pm

Hi Ian - or whoever knows the answer: why is the symbol for current I? Where does that come from? Regards, Martin...
Veit Martin Koch
jamani6505872
Offline Send Email
Jan 24, 2005
6:29 pm

Hi Martin, Thanks for the mail. I'm not totally sure about this but I was always told that it is from the French 'Intensitie' (Intensity) - the effect that...
Ian Taylor
taylor177ian
Offline Send Email
Jan 24, 2005
10:10 pm

André Marie Ampère was indeed French. A current was a phenomenon, not a quantity. The quantity associated with it was the Intensity of the current. Steve...
Steve Bolter
stevebolter
Offline Send Email
Jan 24, 2005
11:36 pm

Good question that. I can easily see that resistance (R) and Voltage is V, but is the deal with Current (I). Btw we are always bombarded by inquisite...
omakhafula
Offline Send Email
Jan 24, 2005
10:12 pm

Good question that. I have always been wondering, but easily could tell that for resistance it was R, and for voltage it was V, pretty much the first letter of...
omakhafula
Offline Send Email
Jan 24, 2005
10:12 pm

It comes from french "intensite". Francisca Dr M F S Wheeler Head of Physics Ampleforth College York YO62 4ER Tel: 01439 766893 E-mail: mfsw@... ...
Francisca Wheeler
mfsw@...
Send Email
Jan 24, 2005
10:09 pm

My name is Martin, I'm an NQT. We just have Ofsted scrutinizing our school this week and I had my first observation today. - They found that I wasn't...
Veit Martin Koch
jamani6505872
Offline Send Email
Jan 24, 2005
10:10 pm

Hi Martin Still being self-critical I see. If it is not too far to come, the next 'Meeting the needs of the most able in science' seminar in Cambridge is on...
Dr. Keith S. Taber
drkeithtaber
Offline Send Email
Jan 24, 2005
10:45 pm

Martin, I know this may seem obvious but have you thought of beginning lessons with a question about the matter to be discussed? I and others have found that...
fernando.espinoza@...
espifern
Offline Send Email
Jan 25, 2005
8:54 am

Martin, I know this may seem obvious but have you thought of beginning lessons with a question about the matter to be discussed? I and others have found that...
fernando.espinoza@...
espifern
Offline Send Email
Feb 4, 2005
10:08 am

Fernando, I thought that was a good hint you gave me there! Thanks! Very simple, very applicable. Will try that next week! Martin Martin, I know this may seem...
Veit Martin Koch
jamani6505872
Offline Send Email
Feb 4, 2005
6:49 pm

Hello Oppress, I believe the positive 'nature' of current flow is attributed to Benjamin Franklin, whose scientific ideas were apparently better known than his...
fernando.espinoza@...
espifern
Offline Send Email
Jan 25, 2005
8:54 am

Hello Fernando, Thank you for your response, appreciate your input too. I see!! Yeah it helped. .... ?? How much of a damage was I inflicting on my'innocent'...
omakhafula
Offline Send Email
Jan 26, 2005
9:31 am

] I came across this: http://www.amasci.com/amateur/elecdir.html ... (when ... perfect ... was ... some 'creativity' ... time ... students ... of ... quickly ...
omakhafula
Offline Send Email
Mar 15, 2005
9:20 pm

I understand it comes from Intensity, used to describe the tingling sensation on the tongue when early investigators used that as a measurement of current! ...
John Oversby
j.p.oversby@...
Send Email
Jan 25, 2005
8:55 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! UK. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help