Sign In
New User? Sign Up
learning-science-concepts · Regarding aspects of learners' scientific conceptions; understanding the learning process; and facilitating science learning.
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
You can set the sort order of messages? Just click on the link in the date column. Your preferences will be remembered, so you don't have to do it again when you return.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
who was that masked constructivist?   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #805 of 899 |
If anyone knows Prof. Alan Cromer's book
'Connected Knowledge: Science, philosophy, and
education, they will know he rants at
'constructivists' and 'constructivism' (although
his real target seems discovery learning). Cromer
claims that in the US science teachers and
science educators are ignorant of science -
strongly implying that such people would not be
science graduates, which I find hard to believeŠ

But anyway I was interested in his account of how
middle school science teachers were on successive
days given a 3 hour 'constructivist' workshop on
floating and bouyancy, followed the next day by
"a ninety-minute demonstration-discussion period
, several hours of laboratory work, and an hour
of final discussion" on the same topic. According
to Cromer "the teachers were confused and angered
by the constructivist's workshop".

There are a range of interesting points here
about the choice of sequencing of the workshops,
the difference in duration of the two inputs, and
how it is implicitly assumed by Cromer that
"ninety-minute demonstration-discussionŠ, several
hours of laboratory work, and an hour of final
discussion" could not be a constructivist
teaching approach!

Anyway, given the implied criticism of the
constructivist educator who kindly agreed to
participate in Cromer's programme I wondered if
anyone knows who this was. I would be very
interested to hear the other side of the
argument, as from my reading this person seems to
have been set up, and I wonder if they were
clearly warned of the context of this work.

I would be rather reticent in involving myself in
a programme with someone who has Cromer's low
opinion of science educators and constructivists
as having "no knowledge of science", being
"ignorant" of science content, "ignorant of the
theoretical structure of science. Š ignorant of
the standard experimental techniques" etc.

I'd very much like to hear from this brave soul.

Keith

--
Dr. Keith S. Taber

http://www.educ.cam.ac.uk/staff/taber.html
http://people.pwf.cam.ac.uk/kst24/

University Senior Lecturer in Science Education
Science Education Centre
University of Cambridge Faculty of Education
184 Hills Road
Cambridge CB2 8PQ
United Kingdom




Tue Feb 26, 2008 2:03 pm

drkeithtaber
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #805 of 899 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

If anyone knows Prof. Alan Cromer's book 'Connected Knowledge: Science, philosophy, and education, they will know he rants at 'constructivists' and...
Dr. Keith S. Taber
drkeithtaber
Offline Send Email
Feb 29, 2008
12:27 pm

Alan Cromer died in 2005. He was a Prof of Physics who regularly railed at science teachers and science educators, although it seems that he provided little...
John Oversby
j.p.oversby@...
Send Email
Mar 2, 2008
9:12 pm

Thanks John. I find much about the US system unfamiliar. Much of what I read from chemistry and physics educators in US Universities seems very reasonable, but...
Dr. Keith S. Taber
drkeithtaber
Offline Send Email
Mar 3, 2008
9:47 am

Hi All: In 1999 I was asked by the editor of the Book Review section of The Physics Teacher (an AAPT journal) to write a review of Cromer's book. I resisted...
Dewey Dykstra
didykstrajr
Offline Send Email
Mar 3, 2008
6:50 pm

Foundations of Chemistry, 2006, vol 8, 93-95. ERIC SCERRI EDITORIAL 23 This special issue came about largely as a result of my own concerns over the...
Eric Scerri
s842897
Offline Send Email
Mar 3, 2008
10:13 pm

I have been following this thread with interest since I too have been critical of constructivism in science education. I had not heard of much about the work...
Eric Scerri
s842897
Offline Send Email
Mar 3, 2008
10:25 pm

A shame this was not published - the editor could have offered the right to reply. (Which is more than Prof Cromer offered his 'constructivist' guest...
Dr. Keith Taber
drkeithtaber
Offline Send Email
Mar 6, 2008
2:35 pm

... I agree, but there are those who apparently value appearances over substance. Dewey ... ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Dewey I....
Dewey Dykstra
didykstrajr
Offline Send Email
Mar 6, 2008
5:58 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! UK. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help