Nicely put, John.
 
I assume that the spelling 'mistake' was intended............
 
Regards
Sue
 
Dr Sue Howarth
Senior Lecturer in Science Education
University of Worcester


 
 
 
 

--- On Fri, 26/9/08, John Oversby <j.p.oversby@...> wrote:

From: John Oversby <j.p.oversby@...>
Subject: Re: LSC: Royal Society decision
To: learning-science-concepts@...
Date: Friday, 26 September, 2008, 11:24 AM






The Royal Society formal position, as is that of Michael Reiss and The
Association for Science Education, is that creationism is not scientific
and is not part of the science curriulum. If a learner raises a creationist
position in class, this presents a golden opportunity to identify and
discuss the components of what makes an approach scientific, in a way that
is not dismissive but is one that seeks to teach the learner about
scientific positions. This was the position of Michael Reiss, and it is
mine, but it seems from the response of some scientits (not Lord Winston or
Roland Jackson of the BA) that any discussion in science should be simply
dismissed. This simply entrenches original positions and prevents further
learning.

John Oversby

On Sep 25 2008, Demoncheaux Eric wrote:

>so, should we or should we not?
>
>Dr E. Demoncheaux
>
>Â
>
>
>
--
From John Oversby
Institute of Education
Reading University
Reading
RG6 1HY
Tel 0118 378 5906


















[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]