Skip to search.
londonfungi

Group Information

  • Members: 150
  • Category: Mycology
  • Founded: Dec 11, 2003
  • Language: English
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
You can schedule a time for the group to chat?
Notice  Upcoming calendar upgrade: Yahoo! Groups calendars are being upgraded to a much improved version. You may not have access to the calendar (for up to 24 hours) when this group is upgraded. We sincerely apologize for this inconvenience.

Home

 

Activity within 7 days:

38 New Messages - 10 New Photos

Description

A forum for *ALL* people interested in fungi who foray in the London area. Professional or amateur, mad-keen microscope-wielder or once-a-year "can I eat it?" wanderer, everybody is welcome to share discoveries, ask questions, publicise forays and courses, or just make contact with like-minded enthusiasts.

"In his article [Dec. 1881] Phillips wrote 'The study of fungi is admitted on all hands to be one of considerable difficulty, especially when pursued by anyone alone and unaided'. Nothing has changed since. We won't get far in the recording of Britain's mycological biodiversity if we all try to go it alone." Alick Henrici, Notes and Records, Field Mycology vol.6(3) July 2005 p.101

Thanks to Gina for the photo, taken in Abney Park Cemetery in March. It's an inkcap, isn't it? And it looks very like one of the commonest of inkcaps in this country - Coprinellus micaceus, Glistening Inkcap. But is it?

Well ... maybe, and maybe not. There are other inkcaps which look similar macroscopically to this species but which differ in microscopic detail, eg. spore shape, and presence or absence of tiny cells (cystidia) projecting from the surface of the fruitbody. Coprinellus truncorum and C.saccharinus are two of these. And this clump of early springers has been provisionally identified as possible C.saccharinus.

But what is C.saccharinus? Is it biologically different from what we call C.micaceus? And, if so, how is it different? Who knows? How can we find out? Perhaps C.micaceus and all its sister taxa are just one, big, variable species - just like Homo sapiens.

I know I'm getting in to deep waters here, but Geoffrey Kibby has reported on this forum that recent DNA studies demonstrate that Boletus edulis, Cep, is one species, worldwide, in all its various sizes, shapes, and colour forms. Sometimes the DNA gives new species, sometimes it takes them away. Fascinating.

"Neither a lumper, nor a splitter be - Do the DNA and then we'll see."

Maybe ...

Message History

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2012 93 30 56 69 161
2011 79 30 36 34 34 52 38 167 120 188 225 155
2010 22 2 36 18 25 14 9 42 66 108 72 36
2009 3 7 19 15 7 6 18 28 12 41 67 47
2008 10 1 1 7 2 12 2 10 39 27 33 6
2007 28 8 4 12 6 1 1 2 11 31 57 6
2006 14 11 2 6 11 1 11 29 32 13 5
2005 6 2 10 15 1 9 5 12 20 28 6
2004 34 20 6 44 18 7 16 16 17 28 6 5
2003 28

Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! UK. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help