Righto then, just wanted to check. It COULD be interpreted as malicious
behaviour, but I wasn't terribly concerned.

On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Megan Entecott <marajade764@...>
wrote:

> Unless anyone's got a direct complaint about him becuase he's got their
> address from here, then I won't ban him. If he does take anyone's address
> and then cause problems then I will ban him, all you need do is send me an
> off-list message about it and I will deal with it as is fit. Can't really
> punish him by that if he hasn't done anything wrong. If he has, then it's
> another matter entirely.
>
> Cheers Caitlin :)
> Megan
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Caitlin Newcomb <caveecat@... <caveecat%40gmail.com>>
> To: mini-jack@... <mini-jack%40yahoogroups.co.uk>
> Sent: Sunday, 6 July, 2008 5:23:05 PM
> Subject: [mini-jack] Heads up kids...
>
> The infamous Jeremy
> Crawford<http://community. livejournal. com/jeremycrawfo rd/profile>is
> trolling about again, and he says he got my address from here. His
> handle
> is crawfordjeremy70200 0, and while you can feel free to chat with him,
> he's
> just going to ask you to write underage nc-17 fic, (also, feel free to egg
> him on for the lulz, because he's apparently been doing this sort of thing
> for years.)
>
> Just a friendly warning, don't want anyone to be surprised and panic.
>
> Megan, do you want to ban him or something? I don't think it's necessary,
> but whatever you want.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Not happy with your email address?.
> Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now
> at Yahoo! http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/ymail/new.html
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]