I concur.

Suzanne

Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 01:21:25 -0000
From: "Buck House Crew Jackie" <buckhousecrew@...>

> It also gives your proposals an airing even though they won't be voted
on at
> the AGM. Are you not keen to hear whether other members share your
views?

I assumed that as the proposals were deemed too late for inclusion they were
null and void and would have to be re-submitted for the 2006 AGM when I
would have found out if other members shared my POV.

> I wouldn't have posted the late proposals, Jackie, except that I knew
> there was a request that we discuss them at the AGM, so I sort of
> counted them in with the others.

Could you tell me who made the request please?
I know I didn't and I'm pretty sure Su didn't either. AFAIK we were both
under the impression that the proposals were dead and buried for the 2005
AGM and would have to be re-submitted (in time ;-D) for the
2006 AGM if we wanted to pursue the issues we wanted raising.