Why not try scanning electron microscopy on the bone tissue of the
skull?

--- In paranormalireland@y..., flytyie <no_reply@y...> wrote:
> Starchild and Lloyd Pye
>
> This story is full of holes
> I have read thro' all the data, which at first glance looks very
> impressive until you start to look closely.
>
> Why has there not been an effort to locate the complete skeletal
> remains of both corpses?
> If they were discovered in caves 100 Miles from a village in Mexico,
> surely they could be found again??
> This would further substantiate Mr. Pye's claims.
> Why did the original finder, keep the skulls and fail to report her
> findings to any authority at the time?
> If you found a human skeleton in the morning what would you do?
> I don't think you'd pull the skull off and leave the rest in the
> ground. That would be the act of a very mentally unstable
individual.
> Why keep the skulls at all?
> This does not make sense to me!
>
> Mr Pye quotes the similarity between the 'alien' and alien
> dissection video- I presume this is the much maligned Santilli
video-
> which is strongly suspected to be a load of fraudulent horse manure
> until proven otherwise by Mr. Santilli., (we are still bloody
waiting
> for definative proof- but hell, there's a market for it, eh?)
>
>
>
> Diagnostic DNA testing
> The end result will be inconclusive. Why??
> There is at least a 70 year time gap before the skulls came into Mr.
> Pye's posession.
> Initial forensic DNA indicates the skull may be human.
> If it has been handled by the many people Mr Pye claims, it is well
> and truly contaminated by human DNA now. Mr Pye, by his own
> admission, says that the diagnostic DNA test is sensitive to human
> contamination!
> Initial results indicate the skull is human.
> How do you know you are looking at the DNA of a grey alien?? What
do
> you compare it to?
> Mr. Pye is assuming that grey aliens have a skeletal structure
similar
> to us.
> That is a bold and tunnel-visioned assumption.
>
> The starchild skull has teeth. I have never read eyewitness
accounts
> saying they saw teeth in grey aliens, with the exception of Whitley
> Streiber in his book Transformation.
> Whitley Streiber writes fiction. So does Lloyd Pye.
> However, the hybrid theory may be more plausible.
> The funny thing is he is quite brave to claim that everything we
know
> about human origins is wrong.
> Quite a strong assertation from a fiction writer with no formal
> qualification in anthropology, or human anatomy. Interestingly
enough
> he has one in psychology.
>
> Is there any possiblity that we are looking at the skull of a simian
> species?? If we had the rest of the starchild remains we could
proove
> this beyond reasonable doubt I'm sure.
> And I'm also sure that if Mr. Pye was not pushing an alien agenda
with
> the starchild skull, he would get more scientists to critically
> evaluate his find.
>
>
> I could go on more but I'll leave it at that….
> I think I've said enough already but do you think I'm being too
> skeptical??;-)