Dear friends of Astronomy, Science Maths and philosophy,
Many a times science has discussion of the theoretical parts of science which is
difficult to put in concrete proofs : but Mathematics' SAC theory does have some
explanations.
LET US see first a process of simple chemical process :- OXIDATION & REDUCTION
and using a SAC theory for the process.
1) in simple primary understanding OXIDATION / REDUCTION are process of some
thing combining with OXYGEN or a reverse the process. where a chemical element O
is required. Bur is that all? NO let us go step further in atomic level
exchanges.
A) as O has a -ve charge : and combines with a Positively charged elemental ion
- similar process happens every where in chemistry and Biochemical processes. SO
OXIDATION & REDUCTION can be explained as process of the combination of +ve &
-ve elementary ions, where OXYGEN is not there!!!
B) going further in sub atomic reactions :- During all the chemical process of
above atomic level reactions there are exchange of -ve charged sub atomic
particles. -ve charged ELECTRONs so it means OXIDATION & REDUCTION can further
be explained as Exchange of the -ve (electrons)/+ve (protons) electronic charge
during the process.
C) further break down of the subatomic particles OXIDATION & REDUCTION does not
need a exchange of -ve (electrons)/+ve (protons) - any -ve (charged sub
particle)/+ve (charged sub particle) can full fill the process at that sub
atomic level.
These theories were based on the basic mathematical SAC theory solutions of the
chemical process of the chemical reactions of the OXIDATION & REDUCTION. AS
actual presence of the element is not necessary for the reaction eg OXIDATION
without Oxygen O2. and all process of chemical reaction and biochemical
Metabolism process falls under the sub OXIDATION & REDUCTION process.
Going BACK to the subject of Space
1) SAC - SPACE is main SAC - includes Earth and all matter in the space, star,
dust and all.
2) SAC Earth is SUB SAC to Space SAC - which includes the Earth materials - ITS
ENERGY, LIFE on the Earth and its ENVIRONMENT and all we SEE/FEEL on the EARTH.
As in Chemical process of the OXIDATION & REDUCTION we seen level of Exchanges
of atomic and sub atomic exchange. here it may be a physical exchange of the
matter of any form of the Energy from the main SAC SPACE and sub SAC EARTH or a
visa versa.
Example 1) if a rocket fly from SUB SAC EARTH to the Main SAC of the SPACE - the
SAC theory says a PART of the SAC Space is occupied by the rocket from the SB
SAC EARTH. so Earth has used a part of Main SAC SPACE. - so Earth is utilising a
space. and part of the SPACE is dragged with the EARTH if Rocket remains in the
SPACE.
Going to next step deeper the process can be similar if an antimatter from the
main SAC SPACE arrives to EARTH SAC instead of MATTER (Rocket) going away from
the Earth.
OR say any form of Energy is driven out of the SAC EARTH to main SAC SPACE - eg
Heat loss of the Earth interior to the space or sound generated by the Earth to
the space. Earth vibration - EARTH SONG!! if the Earth vibration are created by
the Earth then that part of the Vibration energy is going to space using the
space than space is used by the Earth - so earth is taking Space with it while
it travel in the space.
Atmosphere loss in the SPACE by the Earth, or even further WE HAVE some thing
more than PANCH MAHABHOOT with us. AaTMA - LIFE part of the EARTHen life. that
is not a part of PANCH MAHABHOOT and so on the desolations of PANCH MAHABHOOT,
AaTMA does not stay in the Earth. should it be in the SPACE or utilise the MAIN
SAC SPACE while going from the Earthen LIFE? Does that use SPACE and SPACE is
dragged with the EARTH with loss of AaTMA from the EARTHen LIFE?
Previous mail : -
1) As we had some discussion of vibration created in the space by the Earth and
its movements. - what type of waves might those be? how those travel in the
space? does it need a medium to travel in the space - a theoretical medium? what
tune - frequency does it have? is it one of the tune of we know of (sa, re, ga,
ma, pa, dha, ni, sha?) or a different one? now that has become a subject of
Science philosophy.
2) Now a day science is getting a step closer to the more complicated
philosophical subject - "a space dragged by Earth while travel through the
space" !!! But how could that happen? how a space (Vacuum) - non mass can be
dragged behind the Earth. does the space has a MASS? & Gravitation to follow the
rules of Newtonian?
Veda has given some guidelines as every thing are made from only from PANCH
MAHABHOOT (five parts) even our body. It may be very difficult to understand
for who do not have basics of VEDAs but there are other ways to give
mathematical explanations for those.
A) Earth - Earthy elements - Biochemistry of the body and elements of the Earth
& naturally all body elements are from the Earth only and non Earthy elements
can not be there.
B) JAL - Water - fluid - main component of the body.
C) VAYU - GAS - all gaseous composition of the Boby generated in body and also
in Living respiration and decomposition process.
D) AGNI - FIRE - a process of Burning - respiration - digestion - metabolism and
all METABOLIC?ANABOLIC PROCESS OF THE LIFE and even cellular death - cellular
decomposition process after the clinical death.
E - 5 ) A AVKAaSh - AaKAaSH - VACUUM - How that can happen a space in side the
body? BODY does not have a SPACE Vacuum in any of ANATOMICAL and PHYSIOLOGICAL
explanations !!
So what is the fact? Is the Medical science of ANATOMY/PHYSIOLOGY is correct or
the PHILOSOPHY of the Vedic BODY SCIENCE? and why today's Science is after the
theoretical explanations of SPACE DRAGGED BY THE EARTH and EARTH SONG theory of
vibration by the Earth in the space?
ALL this is just difficult of as there are no scientific way to prove those by
the science. but wait for a while there is another way for theoretical
explanations by mathematical theoretical explanation to show that that can be
that. - IF so then Is the VEDIC philosophical body science is correct? was
Rajnishjee was correct what he said 30 years ago when science was in dark?
LET US SEE in the next coming answers of the Mathematical explanatory
theoretical proof - soon after this - Just wait for this.
From Yours : Dr. BHUDIA.- Science Group Of INDIA.
President:"Kutch Science Foundation".
Founder :"Kutch Amateurs Astronomers Club - Bhuj - Kutch".
Life Member:"kutch Itihaas Parishad".
kutchscience@...,
kutchscience@...,
Just click on web page:
http://uk.geocities.com/wildlifeofkutch/
http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/venustransit_2004/
http://www.geocities.com/kutchscience
http://profiles.yahoo.com/kutchscience2000
http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/scienceclubofindia
http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/kutchscience
http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/kachchh
http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/bhuj
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]