The whoniverse database was great. A wiki would be good also. The other Who Wiki was not as detailed about the locations the good doctor visited.
I have been making substancial use of the database, I apologize for being a lurker and not a poster. When I finish with my project, I planned to post something about it.
Alexander Dante <alexanderdante@...> wrote:
Alexander Dante <alexanderdante@...> wrote:
--- In whoconcord@..., "bouncelot"wrote:
>
> I just wanted to ask if anybody is still here, and interested in
> furthering this project. It appears that it's all gone pretty dead.
>
> Anyway, I was considering replacing the Whoniverse database thing
with
> a Wiki, as it might encourage people to take part a bit more.
>
> Any opinions? Should I set up a poll to ask the question?
>
> Stephen GrayI'm still editing and adding entries sporadically, but I've had next
to no feedback from people while doing so - this group seems to be
more of a watch and look group than one where there is a large amount
of debate, which is a pity.
Given that the Doctor Who Wikipedia project has a very active group,
turning the database into a wiki might be a duplication of effort. The
big difference between us and them, as I see it, is that we embrace
the Expanded Universe whereas they try and focus on TV canon.
It might be worth discussing this with Terence Chua/khaosworks who I
think leads the wiki project, to see how to link and cross-reference.
An Expanded Universe Wiki inside Whoniverse could be based on the work
they have already done, but be expanded on.
Their disclaimer "the canonicity of spin-off media is uncertain" could
then be turned into an Expanded Universe link.
AD
Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business.