With things looking underway, I started checking back in past messages to get a feel for the format. There were a few posts in earlier messages I should have noticed, though, so here's my chance to reply with them:
>Just to ask everybody to introduce themselves
>(unless they have a full yahoo profile) - a short
>biog. saying who you are, what your contribution
>would be etc. etc. And to agree to abide by the rules!
I do have a Yahoo profile, but I thought I'd go ahead and introduce myself. I'm Michael, from Iowa in the States. I run the Caption Who website, giving me the opportunity to rewatch the old episodes as I go (the last "old" story being 'The Daemons'). I am looking forward to being a contributor (though not an editor -- I'll leave that to those with more experience in that area).
>The easiest way would be to e-mail each entry
>as it is entered. However, that would mean a
>separate e-mail for each entry, which has the
>potential to floodthe group if a lot is entered
>all at once. The alternative would be to send
>them in batches. It would take a bit more
>them in batches. It would take a bit more
>coding, and would probably require some
>manual intervention (i.e. someone would have
>to specifically activate the code to send the
>summary), but might be more manageable.
I didn't see where this had been decided. Has it been decided to email each entry to the group, then, or will there be coding involved on the Database entry sheet?
>Anyway, we've probably got the list of
>sources now. So shall we get on with
>it?
>sources now. So shall we get on with
>it?
I can hardly wait! :-) I look forward to hearing the source-allocation for everyone.
Michael S. Lucart
Caption Who - the Doctor Who caption repository