Sign In
New User? Sign Up
whoconcord · Doctor Who Concordance
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
You can search the group for older messages.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
What about Wikipedia?   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #63 of 130 |
Re: [whoconcord] Re: What about Wikipedia?

>Incidentally, I'm wondering if, having possibly dropped the ball a bit, the
>onset of summer in the areas of the world most of us live in is going to be a
>help or a hindrance in getting it rolling again.
 
I'm ready to go as soon as its decided who will take what content to go through :-)
 
>Also, I don't recall whether we talked about the possibility of adding essays
>to the volumes discussing contentious issues of continuity. The UNIT volume,
>at least, wouldn't be complete without an essay on UNIT dating (I volunteer
>to do that one when we get to it), for example. Do we want to incorporate
>such essays, if so how? As boxed sections within entries? scattered
>throughout the volume like in I, Who? As an appendix? And what essays do we
>need for each volume? The Gallifrey volume probably deserves an explanation
>of how Gallifreyan time relates to the real universe's and an explanation of
>just what's going on with the Doctor's/Other's/Morbius Doctor's origins to
>name two that come to mind immediately.

Myself, I think that would be more in line with an appendix-section.... since the entries themselves could clearly be stating factual information about the subjects themselves.  Once you get into essays (especially when it comes to UNIT continuity), there tends to be reconciling and so forth .... and since facts are what we're looking for, bending them to suit purposes would be better served in the back-section.  As far as they go, though, I think they'd be a nice addition -- the same way that the Cartmel-Masterplan document was put in the back of the original "History of the Universe" volume.
 
 
 
Michael S. Lucart
Caption Who - the Doctor Who caption repository
 
 


Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:14 pm

jafytown@...
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #63 of 130 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Hi, I am Sam. Newbie. Wannabe contributor. Confused participant. You have the discussion site here (thumbs up); You have a database over there (points to...
Samuel
member; u=20...
Offline Send Email
Jul 13, 2005
2:18 pm

... why ... Thanks Sam, sounds like a valid point. I've seen the odd link to wikipedia, but didn't know the extent of it. So long as there's a means of...
Alexander Dante
member; u=21...
Offline Send Email
Jul 13, 2005
2:21 pm

... You mean whoniverse.org. :p unit.org.uk is one of the the BBC's tie-in sites for the new series. ... OK, so we probably need a review of where we've got to...
Stephen Gray
member; u=12...
Offline Send Email
Jul 13, 2005
9:28 pm

... <snip> ... itself to the TV series (which, given Wikipedia's audience, is entirely justified), whilst we're attempting to include absolutely everything. ...
Alexander Dante
member; u=21...
Offline Send Email
Jul 13, 2005
9:55 pm

... Hi there - khaosworks here. I'm very flattered that you would ask me to join this project, and please, as befits the open spirit of the GDFL license, feel...
Terence Chua
member; u=15...
Offline Send Email
Jul 15, 2005
6:50 pm

... to join this project, and please, as befits the open spirit of the GDFL license, feel free to crib as much from our WikiProject Doctor Who as you'd like....
Alexander Dante
member; u=21...
Offline Send Email
Jul 15, 2005
7:00 pm

... Fair enough. I had a brief exchange either via e-mail or via Outpost Gallifrey with whoever was mostly responsible for the UNIT entry, where he said that ...
Stephen Gray
member; u=12...
Offline Send Email
Jul 17, 2005
8:35 pm

... Odd, that, since I'm the one mostly responsible for the UNIT entry. :) I honestly don't remember telling you that (I do recall telling you your UNIT files...
Terence Chua
member; u=15...
Offline Send Email
Jul 18, 2005
10:18 am

... Ah, that's probably what I remember, then. Maybe JNT was right, and the memory does cheat. Steve...
Stephen Gray
member; u=12...
Offline Send Email
Jul 19, 2005
5:20 pm

... I'm ready to go as soon as its decided who will take what content to go through :-) ... Myself, I think that would be more in line with an...
Michael S. Lucart
public
Offline Send Email
Jul 14, 2005
12:32 pm

... adding essays to the volumes discussing contentious issues of continuity. The UNIT volume, at least, wouldn't be complete without an essay on UNIT dating...
Alexander Dante
member; u=21...
Offline Send Email
Jul 14, 2005
8:33 pm

... OK, let's start making some decisions then. See my other posts for a summary of where we've got to so far. We're aiming for the Gallifrey volume to go...
Stephen Gray
member; u=12...
Offline Send Email
Jul 15, 2005
7:18 pm

... Sounds good to me :-) Since we'd talked earlier about the Target novelizations, I'll pick the Target versions of Deadly Assassin and Three Doctors -- and...
Michael S. Lucart
public
Offline Send Email
Jul 18, 2005
10:18 am

... Cool, Incidentally, Naik Clarke asked if he could do the first 2 Key to Time stories. Steve...
Stephen Gray
member; u=12...
Offline Send Email
Jul 18, 2005
6:27 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! UK. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help