Re: [balsallheathonline] Re: Moderation - ps
- 2008/10/27 martin_mullaney <mullaney3@...>:
> Barnard, as has been pointed out. If the men and women wereMartin if this had been any other meeting you could not have said a thing
> segregated, why couldn't they have been segregated along the length of
> the room, so women had the option of sitting at the front. Making the
> women sit at the back, behind the men does not look good.
> Also, what about women who didn't want to be segregated or wear a head
> dress. Was there an area set aside for them? From the photos, this was
> clearly not the case.
> Remember, this was a political meeting open to all. It was not a
> mosque meeting, where we would be more culturally sensitive.
it is only because its a Respect meeting that you are saying a word
I have seen the same thing happen at many other meetings and would
no doubt happen at LibDem meetings if a large number of of women
from the Asian Community attended
There is no evidence that the meeting was segregated other the by
the choose of the women
No doubt the organisers will make sure that it does not happen again that
a photograph would give that impression I have seen several other photos
of that meeting showing women and men mixing happly
Don't forget there was female on the platform and speaking and
taking part in the meeting
You Martin are just political mud throwing
- --- In balsallheathonline@..., "martin_mullaney" <mullaney3@...> wrote:
> In my case, I now moderated, because I was the target of abusiveHi,
> messages. .......so I am now being moderated for being the victim. How
> does one square that logic?
Could you tell us when and where you allege this occurred Martin?
A simple link to the message would suffice.