367Re: A couple of points...
- Dec 27, 2007I agree with Dave. Formula De wd be a good choice for a league,
better than Team RoboRally, and better than Apocalypse which we risk
not finishing each time, which tends to make apportioning positions
tricky! But what's the min number of players for it to be worth
getting Formula De out of the box?
--- In lbgc@..., David Bullions <davebullions@...>
>that date for TI3, as I will be at a SuperBowl party (booked & paid
> Hi Gang
> Just a couple of things:
> First of all regarding Feb 3rd. I can confirm that I can't make
for). However I am very cool regarding TI3 and if you want to play on
Feb 3rd then please, by all means, do. No hurt feelings at all.
>De for two reasons: 1. I haven't played it as much as I would like
> Second thing: My personal choice for league play would be Formula
and I think league play would mean this game makes it onto the table
a bit more often. 2. The formula one racing system is ideal for
>vote against this because of the time it takes to play (even with
> Regarding Andrew's suggestion of a league for Apocalypse, I would
LBGC house rules, secret targets etc). The game tends to take up most
of a session.
> Well thats my Tuppence worth. Feel free to discuss.
> Telly addicts unite!
- << Previous post in topic