Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

458Re: [lbgc] Re: An Imperial fun-league?

Expand Messages
  • Garner
    Feb 26, 2008
      BrianO, StuartF/Stania , DaveB, TomasP.
      I think is how it finished, Stuart and Stania were on the same points, not sure of tiebreak conditions in the game, and what the conditions were in the game to trigger them.


      On 26/02/2008, Founder. <bobroscow@...> wrote:

      Really? I'm sure you must be right, since you won it. I was two
      floors down, and my notes were a week later!

      But that leaves Neil a nice choice: you can keep it to Imperial, or
      even make it an Imperial/Antike league! Lateral, huh? After all,
      they're similar and by the sdame designer, the one apparently an
      advanced version of the other. Lacks some purity, but means you get
      off the ground with 2 sets of results instead of just one.

      Brian, you may also remember who came 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th in that
      Antike you won?


      --- In lbgc@..., Garner <garner.ucd@...> wrote:
      > Bob,
      > We played Antike on the 10th not Imperial.
      > Brian

      > On 26/02/2008, Founder. <bobroscow@...> wrote:
      > >
      > > Hi guys!
      > >
      > > I like having these leagues on Perikles and Team RoboRally. They
      > > not turning out to narrow us into mainly playing them. They add a
      > > dimension when we DO play them. And they give us something else to
      > > post on the site ...
      > >
      > > SO, how about a third league-table ... for Imperial? It got played
      > > the session-before-last, and the session before that, and seems
      to be
      > > a favourite that will get played repeatedly?
      > >
      > > There's no reason that it should be ME as scorekeeper. I nominate
      > > NeilP. OK by you, Neil?
      > >
      > > I mention it now because it's only 9 days since we last played
      it, so
      > > you guys might REMEMBER who came 1st, 2nd 3rd etc. in order to get
      > > the table started. A league-table only looks OK after the second
      > > game, but you need a first to get it started...
      > >
      > > I can remind you that the 6 who played it on 17 Feb 08 were DaveB,
      > > KeithD, NeilP, GeorgeY, MartialC and HenningS. I recall hearing
      > > KeithD won, but not the other placings. But it's only 9 days ago.
      > > Post here, all of you, on your recollections of who scored second,
      > > third etc. In fact, also feel free to give your version of how the
      > > game went, and why/how you won or lost!
      > >
      > > I can also remind you that the 5 of you who played it on 10 Feb
      > > BrianO, DaveB, StuartF, TomasP and Stania (I'm 99% sure). So maybe
      > > you can remember who came 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th that day, if you all
      > > chip in, so as to have TWO games to start the league-table with. I
      > > recall that BrianO won, but you need to remember placings for a
      > > league. That would make 2 games and a decent first league-table.
      > >
      > > Neil can choose a scoring system and post the league. Probably
      > > to copy the LEAGUE-formula of Perikles and Team RR, for
      > > ie cumulated points divided by games-played+1. But up to you what
      > > points you earn, for positions in games of 4, 5 or 6. Eg your call
      > > as to whether coming first is only slightly rewarded over coming
      > > second, or else a big gap. What do you think, Neil?
      > >
      > > Bob
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > --
      > Brian
      > http://bofarrell.blogspot.com/
      > http://viewingsport.blogspot.com/
      > http://lookintothisweek.blogspot.com/

    • Show all 8 messages in this topic