Poll results for soloDBAdevelopment
- View SourceThe following soloDBAdevelopment poll is now closed. Here are the
POLL QUESTION: Hello everyone,
I would appreciate your opinions on this issue. There is a DBA variant called 'DBA RRR' which extends DBA though to about AD 1700. Is it worth trying to include direct support for it in Solo DBA?
How widely known and used is DBA RRR? Personally, I enjoy playing it. However, I cannot support many extensions of DBA, otherwise Solo DBA will get complicated and hence probably unusable. As you are aware, I am trying to finish Solo DBA for DBA version 2.2 fairly soon. If I try and include procedures specifically for DBA RRR then the probability is that they might not be fully tested. Currently, the only armies that I have for the period AD 1500 to 1700 are for the English Civil War.
DBA RRR has additional troop types, and also rules including flank support, for instance, pike and shot adjacent to each others are stronger against mounted than if they are not The deployment section would need amending to make Solo DBA to be DBA RRR friendly.
1) Include additional procedures for DBA RRR, even though they may not be tested thoroughly?
2) Produce a sheet of amendments for DBA RRR and other period variants that I choose to support?
3) Let solo players make their own adjustments?
CHOICES AND RESULTS
- Include additional procedures for DBA RRR, 3 votes, 21.43%
- Produce a sheet of amendments for DBA RRR, 6 votes, 42.86%
- Let solo players make their own adjustments, 5 votes, 35.71%
For more information about this group, please visit
For help with Yahoo! Groups, please visit