44Re: RE:Reign in Darkness
- May 31, 2005--- In therealhorrorclub@..., "Baron"
> checkout this link http://www.sexgoremutants.f9.co.uk/frame1.htmlhorror
> this gives a nice review of what is a dire example of modern
> This is a truily dreadful movie, and should be considered one of
> true greats.... why? This movie just fails on almost every front.only
> Picture the scene a guy is experimenting with the cure for HIV,
> they have lied to him and he is actually making a vampire serum.He
> accidently injects himself and becomes a vampire. Then he has toto
> fight off his employers. The employers send out the bounty hunters
> kill him off. They have trouble succeeding as he is veryresourceful
> and likes to do long monolgues. Decent enough if not well usedsupposed
> What is the movie like?
> Really awful. The acting is awful, I am not sure where is
> to be set but the accents are all over the place. The music isquite
> good but the songs are dreadful. Also there are simply dire voicecars..
> overs. This is a cheapo movie. They have a gun battle and no one
> gets shot. No car gets damaged in the film. Ooh be nice to
> well I just do not think that they had no money. In the sGMreview
> the autor thinks that the movie is very influenced by Blade and Iam
> inclined to agree with him.plot,
> I did a bullet count on the guns and recon that he shot about 100
> bullets out of a 15 bullet magazine. The worst thing about this
> movie is that it could have been good. A bit more work on the
> a few more sword fights and you have a worthy alternative to blade.your
> This movie is a dud avoid unless the mirror mirror tetrology is
> idea of fun. 0/10.lol sounds bad big time so one to AVOID hehe.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>